Serenata posted:
Maybe because the main character isn't a lolicon, but the reader is... I mean, if you fall in love with someone of your age when you're teenager, that makes you a pedo? so the tag might imply that there's a lolicon in the series but the true lolicon is inside all of us.
So maybe the tag needed here is just loli
That's what "bothers" me with the lolicon tag here. I don't think lusting after someone your age when you're 12/13 can be considered being a lolicon.
And I'm not even under the impression that the characters are "lolis" either. Their youthfulness isn't emphasized, and nobody lusts after the imouto for now.
As you say, if anything, it would be the reader that could be considered a lolicon if they look sexually at the characters, but tags aren't for the tagging the readers, but the content.