Re: Retitling

Sometimes I click on things I think I might like and realize after a couple of pages that it’s the kind of thing I don’t like. So I click away.

Is there some compelling reason that solution would not work in this case?

Some people aren't aware of the reader's sacred right to stop reading whenever they want, maybe?

Some people also might not like having child pornography in their search engine profiles. Like I have said repeatedly there is no logical argument as to why the title cannot be changed to make it clearer and decrease the odds of a miss-click. It will take literally like 4 minutes of somebody's time to fix this. That is the only down side. The simple fact is a large number of people are miss-clicking on this thinking it is something that it is not. There is absolutely no real reason not to fix it with a simple title change.

Who's fault is it for misclicking? If they don't want "child pornography" in their search engine, then delete the history. It's the consequence of being stupid. Deleting it won't take a minute of their time and then, move on with their life. And also, learn to read the whole thing first and the tags before clicking. The word HENTAI is in the title itself. What's not clear about it? So I don't see why the admins here would adjust to some people's stupidity.

last edited at Jul 20, 2018 2:12AM

Oh, it does exist.

...oh god, is this going to be 12 pages of people arguing about... ah, yep. Fuck.

Alright, wannabe concern police, listen up:

As someone who's been in the unfortunate position of having encountered actual child pornography, you are wrong.

This is not the same. It's not even close to the same. This isn't like how the food in display cases is really just intensely impressive sculpture; it's a whole different ballgame. The most creepy loli rape art you can find doesn't even scratch the surface of how gross the "real deal" is and, for your sakes, I hope you never experience this difference for yourself.

The yawning gulf between "kids playing Cowboys and Indians" and "suicide-bombing religious extremists" is still an order of magnitude off from the difference between loli and actual pedo stuff.

So fuck you for giving me a reason to recall that shit. Go away.

SHLICK SHLICK

i like this

Yeah, even if it had been titled the way you requested, it's clear it wouldn't have mattered. Despite the title and tags, people read this anyway, only to be shocked it was lolicon porn. Giving it a awkward title that assumes stuff we don't know (I'd like to imagine this isn't canon and is just some porn they drew for fun, but only Itou knows) would change nothing.

:/ People gonna read what they gonna read.

Should've hid the tags and the title since it contains spoiler y'know? ¤ wink wink ¤

last edited at Jul 20, 2018 7:09AM

This thread is gold. Maybe we could use loli works to determine fitness to vote.

And yet, Oshikko Sensei has only 51 comments. Go figure.

And yet, Oshikko Sensei has only 51 comments. Go figure.

She's a medical professional. She knows what she's doing.

For some reason this is a bit .... disturbing

And yet, Oshikko Sensei has only 51 comments. Go figure.

That’s the second time around.

I looked at the title, and the title looked at me. In the end, curiosity won.

she`s a woman of culture.

I don't even know why someone would push for the title of this to be changed to "Non-Canon OneeLoli Hentai, Master and Mel." It reeks of absolute desperation to reject the well-established fact that this is how Itou Hachi feels about her characters. Canonicity probably isn't even something that crossed her mind because whether it has happened or not at the current point in time of the story is irrelevant - to her, it's something that inevitably will happen.

The idea that it would somehow reduce the number of these supposed misclicks (which totally aren't just people who know they hate it and feel compelled to read it so they can complain about it more) is ridiculous, when that's not even the source of the problem in the first place.

Yikes

page 1 and 2 were enough for me to pass this in a heartbeat. I didnt think it was going to be legit. I was wrong.

last edited at Jul 20, 2018 11:00PM

Lol first nsfw work of Itou is this, pretty hardcore but still ok. You all forgetting the part when Mel wore the shirt of master and master couldn't look because it is too seductive. They are lovers and Mel is more like a pet than a child, animals and humans age differently.

I just wish this had more pages, but I hope this gets a sequel.

I can't believe yall have time to write walls of text over some drawings you're all being ridiculous

I can't believe yall have time to write walls of text over some drawings you're all being ridiculous

Pfttt, you call this "walls of text"? Visit Citrus comment section to see what the real walls of text looks like

Damn... Human's mind is so fucked up.

I REGRET NOTHING GET ME TO THE FUCKING JAIL

Spidey no D:

I can't believe yall have time to write walls of text over some drawings you're all being ridiculous

Pfttt, you call this "walls of text"? Visit Citrus comment section to see what the real walls of text looks like

The yuzumori san thread says" walls of text? hold my beer"
and you know what's the funniest part yuzumori wasn't a NSFW manga

last edited at Jul 21, 2018 12:49PM

I can't believe yall have time to write walls of text over some drawings you're all being ridiculous

Pfttt, you call this "walls of text"? Visit Citrus comment section to see what the real walls of text looks like

The yuzumori san thread says" walls of text? hold my beer"
and you know what's the funniest part yuzumori wasn't a NSFW manga

Oh man, I got caught up in that one—it it ended up as one of those “Oh my God, evidently words don’t mean what words mean” situations, and that’s always a bad scene.

Yuzumori-san was notable for setting up a very problematic age-gap romance and then actually dealing with the implications of the situation (while also being very funny).

Itou Hachi is like, “Isn’t age-gap adorable? And let’s throw a species-gap in there too! That’ll make it even more adorable!”

And it’s not like she’s wrong . . .

Damn 13 comments pages, and I'm too late to take part into the shitstorm.

Anyways the only question I always had when it comes to lolicon is why everyone who likes it is automatically considered a pedophile, I mean I get why people would make a correlation but we're talking about anime characters, not a realistic representation of real life people, I think people may have their own reasons to like it rather than "is CP that doesn't gets you in jail" like many people seems to think.

Personally I don't even see it as a form of child porn, even the idea sounds kind of ridiculous like when someone says that violent video games are for murderers or that they turn mentally sane people into murderers.

And what if someone is into lolicon / shotacon but is disgusted by the idea of watching actual CP or trying anything with an actual kid, why would that person be a pedophile? This also reminds me a lot to when furries were often accused of being into zoophilia, like if a drawed anthropomorphic representation of an animal were the same thing as an actual real life animal.

last edited at Jul 21, 2018 9:43PM

Damn 13 comments pages, and I'm too late to take part into the shitstorm.

Anyways the only question I always had when it comes to lolicon is why everyone who likes it is automatically considered a pedophile, I mean I get why people would make a correlation but we're talking about anime characters, not a realistic representation of real life people, I think people may have their own reasons to like it rather than "is CP that doesn't gets you in jail" like many people seems to think.

Personally I don't even see it as a form of child porn, even the idea sounds kind of ridiculous like when someone says that violent video games are for murderers or that they turn mentally sane people into murderers.

And what if someone is into lolicon / shotacon but is disgusted by the idea of watching actual CP or trying anything with an actual kid, why would that person be a pedophile? This also reminds me a lot to when furries were often accused of being into zoophilia, like if a drawed anthropomorphic representation of an animal were the same thing as an actual real life animal.

I think obviously Loli is somewhat related to CP, but its more like...? being attracted to the idea of the victim/master and height difference and power play that CP is known for without scarring a childs life. People are disgusted w real cp bc it involves a real person who is being raped. Whereas Loli is like the roleplay version of that. Similarly people have rape fantasies and will roleplay them with their partners but im 100% sure they arent actually suggesting they want to be raped. ( in my opinion )