Even if we were to believe her that this was her only motivation for rummaging through Makino's stuff, it is still a violation of privacy to enter someone's bedroom without permission (or some kind of emergency), as far as I am concerned. :-)
For real ? I send you the page where you can see that she was doing it genuinly for once and you stil deny it and force the narrative of "violating privacy" when she was cleaning the room. Not her mom fault she let the love hotel card in plain view. I guess it's a 1-1 in terms od denying one 's arguments.
No, what you have sent me was a page where Makino's mom has been caught red-handed while rummaging through her adult child's private items without her permission, justified her violation of said child's privacy with a claim of help that the latter has never asked for, then immediately shifted attention and blame from her own transgression onto Makino's, conveniently leaving the latter no room to question her mom's actions.
I am just not inclined to believe in the "genuineness" of a character's intentions when a) she has just been caught doing something morally dubious by the person she was doing it to and b) has no prior history of genuine respect for that person in the first place, as has been pointed out above.
EDIT: And just for the sake of completeness and of not "denying one's arguments", the argument of "not her mom's fault for not hiding the card" is loaded with the presumption that Makino's bedroom is not her private space, to begin with. If a space is private, it shouldn't matter whether something in it is "in plain view" or not, as no one but the owner should access it. Makino's room does have a door with "Makino" clearly spelled on it, which marks a very clear boundary where the family space ends and her private space begins.
last edited at Sep 5, 2022 12:54PM