Well... looks like they got the right educational materials to me...
Unless there's going to be some older (or younger) person coming into this mix, I don't think the lolicon tag is warranted here.
I always figured the lolicon tag was for sexualized depictions of lolis? In this case, there happens to be a naked little girl prominently featured in sexual scenarios, which is presumably part of the appeal either on the author's end, or intended to cater to a particular demographic of readers (or both). I'm not really an expert here, though, since I tend to avoid the lolicon tag, and only ended up reading this on mangadex first because it looked cute. Considering that some readers (like myself) could come in expecting purely wholesome stuff and get kinda icked out by seeing the little kids start having sex halfway, I feel like the tag is justified.
Six of one, half a dozen of the other... The first year could qualify as a loli because of her body style, despite her age being only a year younger than the other girl. Taiga in Toradora is frequently referred to as a loli, after all, and she is the same age as the rest of the cast. However, the "lolicon" tag is a bit off. That suggests that there is an older character who has a fetish for young girls with that body type or a teen who has a crush on a much younger girl, like an elementary or early middle school girl. That doesn't appear to be the case here. So if there's a "loli" tag, that might be more appropriate than "lolicon".
last edited at Oct 23, 2020 1:09PM
