I'm actually less worried about the psychopaths who commit murders and more worried about the ones who become investment bankers or government policymakers
I can broadly sympathise with this. Physical violence put me in hospital for a night, but workplace backstabbing put me on anti-depressants for much longer, and it affected more people than just me.
I try not to demonise anyone whose politics oppose mine, or people in the financial industry, but it is disturbing when systems openly select for dangerous traits. It's hard not to feel that something has to change, even if I'm ill-equipped to say what.
But basically, I'm a tit-for-tat kind of person.
I'm more the stoic, yielding type, both by temperament and upbringing, though I have limits like any functioning adult. I guess this may account for some differences in our perspective that we can't easily resolve, not that we should want to, of course.
Caring about psychopaths, whether the murderous kind or not is a good way to get hosed.
Perhaps, but one can practise empathy while managing one's boundaries. It's very much a requirement for some jobs. In fact, if you're consistently dealing with the wobblier side of humanity, it might be the sole means of staying sane.
And we have no real way of knowing what they are truly bothered by--they'd lie.
I feel you could say that about most people, and they'd lie for plenty of reasons other than self-interest or malice. You may find this interesting. It's an article by an apparently typical person, who has the brain profile of a psychopath. I don't feel their personal account is any more self-serving or unreliable than many.
As a rather key for-instance, the acquisition of wealth seems to foster psychopathic traits.
I suspect we're on the same side of an ideological fence.
I'll have to check out of the discussion for now because I'll either begin to sprawl beyond my scope or chase my own tail, if I'm not doing so already. I think we've clocked each other's angles without eating each other alive. That will do for me.