It's not just a "charitable reading". Do ya'll even know what story you're already reading?
The land is already owned by the one ruling over it, they don't "own" the village.
The intention to buy is just to move it from one lord to another lord.
And how did the first lord come to own the land? Are they ethnically Mulai, or a foreigner that conquered the place with violence?
Alaska is already owned by Russia, the natives don't "own" the village.
Louisiana is already owned by France, the Indians don't "own" the village.
The intention to buy is just to move it from one lord to another lord.
Because the line between exploitation and business can be very thin. Ultimately that's who Hesha and Jolene are, they're businesswomen
Hesha and Jolene are aware of the real value of the product, and they know the villagers aren't, so they immediately decided to take advantage of it. That's exploitation. In my book "business" implies a fair trade between peers.
For me, if the villagers looked and dressed the same as Hesha or Jolene, without changing any of the plot or writing, I could easily see this kind of thing taking place between any number of European countries back in the day.
Yeah, that's my issue with it. The author could have decided to portray the villagers as poor citizens that had to resort to banditry to get by. But instead decided to portray them as foreign "savages".
I'm not accusing just yet the author of portraying colonialism in a positive light, I'll wait to see how the story unfolds and to see if Hesha and Jolene get a change of heart. But these are the vibes I'm getting for now, and it's uncomfortable.
So…are we supposed to root for KellyxDiana? Really cannot bring myself to like Diana in any way for how psychotic she’s been.
Hesha was also a psychopathic spoiled noble at the beginning of the story, trust the process.
last edited at Sep 4, 2026 7:11AM