Does it really matter in this context? That interpretation makes a little more sense than mine so I'll go with it.
Of course it matters, it's a huge plot point that is completely left to interpretation.
I was making an inference. Kei, to the very last page, seems absolutely miserable and resigned to the idea that Sachi doesn't truly love her (whether or not this is the truth). Not everyone initiates a break in this situation, but my feeling is that Kei will.
Another thing left completely up to reader's interpretation because the writer couldn't convey the character's thoughts all that well. Kei feels like just a replacement but will that lead her to staying or leaving? We don't know, it doesn't show or tell us.
It could be either, but I don't believe that ambiguity defeats the purpose of the story.
Of course the ambiguity defeats the purpose of the story. Especially when almost every major detail is ambiguous. Why does Kei hate smoking so much and why does she associate it only with men? Is Sachi still dating the guy? Did Sachi ever even date the guy or was it a one sided crush? Why did Sachi vanish for three months and then show up like it was nothing? Where did she even go? Is Kei just a rebound or does Sachi actually love her? Do they actually break up or does Sachi finally feel like she can move on and keep on being with Kei? If the entire plot of the story is left up to individual interpretation then it's not well written.
last edited at Jun 18, 2017 7:47AM