Nah man. This is porn that depicts a child having sex with an older woman. By its very definition is child porn. Sorry you don't like your porn called by what it is
Then you're just admitting you care more about your rhetoric than the actual victims of child sexual abuse. Which is unfortunate, but pretty normal.
I'm gonna bow out. I tried to be as straightforward and reasonable about things as I could so people could maybe understand my perspective but that takes a toll and doesn't have much of a payoff so I need a break. Have fun, everyone.
By its very definition, child porn is abuse, since no child is in age to give consent. All child porn is wrong because it portrays children having sex before they can give consent. Again, sorry to call your fetish or whatever by its name, but having a little kid portrayed having sex IS child porn, regardless of how you feel about it.
Look, I'm not gonna go all preaching about this with you about why child porn is wrong or whatever. Just understand that lots of us consider this kind of content to be wrong and will get quite vocal about it. However, I do recognize that the whole "GTA let's me kill people but I'm no killer" argument has some solid evidence in its favor, and it could very well translate into this kind of conversation.
Just....Please dudes, gals, non binary duderinos, do not touch children in real life. Sounds like a dumb thing to write, but we live in a time when we have to remind people that attacking people because they are different is wrong, so I'm just elevating this plea
last edited at Jul 18, 2018 10:25PM