Helvetica Scans
joined Sep 11, 2014
Maybe I wasn't clear enough, but my key point was that every author should have the creative freedom to turn the characters into whatever they want to create and that, in Love Live's case, yuri isn't the only way, even if you personally think it's the best way, and that's the beauty of fanmade works, that's why I find it kind of unfair to despise authors who do futa or genderbender instead of most people's favorite, yuri.
Putting aside whether or not it's just for the sake of penis or for the sake of self intersting the reader into some het fantasy or even if it's poorly written porn, the fact still stands, it's not "more wrong" to do one over the other as at the end of the day none of them are canon works and as such should never be bound by imaginary rules such as "Love Live is only yuri".
Don't like futa? That's perfectly fine. Even I prefer yuri Love Live over futa Love Live. (I wasn't arguing against it btw, just mentioning I know a couple people who dislike the yuri aspect of the Love Live fandom as much as some people here seem to despise futa just because their preferences don't align).
But saying the author is doing something bad by drawing a futa comic really doesn't sit well with me.
last edited at Jun 21, 2015 11:54AM