That way you can try your best to sound clever while also not having to try to actually defend the faults in something that you like.
It's also possible they don't see them as faults. It's also possible to like something despite its faults.
It can be interesting to see what is wrong in something in order to improve it, or to recognise faults if you want to create something and uses it as referential. But as a reader, why shouldn't we be allowed to simply enjoy a story without having to pick every details out?
Some people just have better tolerance than you have is all. I think you have made your point quite clearly several pages ago.
last edited at Dec 24, 2017 12:38AM