Hello, police? I'd like to report a crime

Yeah………
we all are going to Jail now Σ（・□・；）

last edited at Jun 7, 2017 5:13AM

Like you haven't read worse stuff, little babies xD

I knew it was a mistake to read this...

Art is top notch however :P

Not good for my brain.

Finally some solid Kanna x Saikawa porn!

BOHE-BOHE-BOHEEEEEEEEEEEEH

And it's in fullcolor too, holy shit.

last edited at Jun 7, 2017 6:34AM

Wicked

So if ya'll shopped around more you'd know the loli dragon was lewded about 4 months ago.

Dammit guys we had one rule about Kanna

ONE RULE

To be completely fair, it was broken by the DVD specials as well.

Then again, this was a little too much.

Gotta love how Maidragon divided the world in two opposing factions regarding whether it's ok or not to "lewd the dragon loli"

Ravioli ravioli why did you lewd the loli

Nope. Nope. Nopenopenope. Nuh-uh. No way. See ya, space cowboy.

FBI!
RAISE YOUR HANDS ALL OF YOU
YOU ARE UNDER ARREST

MUST

PROTECT

DRAGON

LOLI

Seriously, this fanbase is cancer, at the start the only reason it was wrong to lewd Kanna it was because hetero, I'll never understand how it extended to Saikawa too.

Saikawa is her partner that Kanna directly picked, they can lewd each other as much as they want.

Is this the reason that nobody is writing fanfics of them too? Because of a stupid youtube meme?

Komi028 posted:

Seriously, this fanbase is cancer, at the start the only reason it was wrong to lewd Kanna it was because hetero, I'll never understand how it extended to Saikawa too.

Saikawa is her partner that Kanna directly picked, they can lewd each other as much as they want.

Is this the reason that nobody is writing fanfics of them too? Because of a stupid youtube meme?

???? I thought we were just joking and having fun, no one here is stupid enough to think that this is the first doujin or hentai art made of these two.

This gives me mixed feelings.

???? I thought we were just joking and having fun, no one here is stupid enough to think that this is the first doujin or hentai art made of these two.

Even if the ravioli posters are joking. Most people saying they dropped this halfway through reading this seem to be serious.

And it's true people are purposely avoiding to write fanfics of them.

last edited at Jun 7, 2017 11:26AM

Okay, I'm just browsing​ through the comment section just to see if it was worth reading and risked going jail for or not...

Oh my god, is this comedy? And how the hell is she coming from having her vulva stretched?

Do you not know the character? Girl practically orgasms whenever Kanna just brushes up against her.

Never have I had mixed feelings about a doujin

Komi028 posted:

???? I thought we were just joking and having fun, no one here is stupid enough to think that this is the first doujin or hentai art made of these two.

Even if the ravioli posters are joking. Most people saying they dropped this halfway through reading this seem to be serious.

And it's true people are purposely avoiding to write fanfics of them.

Well, I would never understand those who even though the tags are very clear, would go ahead and read and then get mad about it... There's no excuse for that! Like... Really Toys loli nsfw what were they expecting? lol
I don't know about fanfic but there's plenty of hentai... I know a meme won't stop me if I feel like drawing them.

Misuzi one thing is criticism about this doujin but if you go as far as calling the anime reactions impossible, I suggest stop pretending that an anime about Dragon maids from other world was intended to be serious.

last edited at Jun 7, 2017 1:53PM

It was well drawn.

Other than that, it's just boring hentai. I flipped through it without even reading.

gotta respect the artist who drawing the character close to the official.

Made me chuckle real good, ahem...back to being depressed

Uhmmm... I don't how old is Kanna but Saikawa is probably like less than 10 years old??? This is so wrong.... I mean I know they are fictional characters but still...

Lurker and reader, made account because this is just WRONG. I dropped this the moment I opened the 4th page.

Please remove this from here.