Forum › Wicked Squishy Dragon Heaven discussion

Sshot-8
joined Oct 25, 2011

Now if this was Kobayashi and Toru, I'd be fine with it. Even a fluffy story with Kanna, I can get behind. But I don't want to see Kanna like this...

Out of curiosity, then, why did you even click on that link ? I mean, as somebody else mentioned already, the tags were in no way confusing. There was the pairing, which made it obvious it was about those two, lolicon which would warn anybody not knowing either the manga or anime that the girls would be lolis, then lots of sex which made obvious that the plot would be crying in a corner all alone while the girls would get naughty for pretty much every page aside from the blank ones. Finally, with the bath and toys tags thrown in the mix, you even knew before clicking where and how they'd get all naughty.

Frankly, with all those tags, I don't see how one can click that link thinking it'd be about the girls playing monopoly while enjoying a cup of tea.

Oh, and I quote you, but that was not directed at just you, but at all those who came here knowing already that they hated this kind of work. I mean, you can just stay the heck away from it if it does offend you. I know that I do when I see some tags that I know I'll dislike. And even if I do check it out thinking it might not be that bad and end up pleasantly surprised... Well, if I'm wrong, I blame myself rather than posting to tell people how they shouldn't enjoy what they like and getting all angry at everybody who did and/or the place hosting it.

Also, don't worry, no actual people were hurt in the making of that doujin. Well... Unless, of course, the author stubbed their toe or cut their finger in the process, but I'm sure we can all get over it.

I get tired of reading this. Not because it's wrong, but because it shouldn't need repeating all the time.

1385408507407
joined May 4, 2013

I wouldn't say that loli by definition means lolita-complex, because there's also the element of moe within loli characters, which in my understanding of the term comes from the desire of the reader to protect the character and wanting them to succeed in their endeavors. But this is kinda hot in all the wrong ways while also being hilariously controversial, shame though SJWs want to ban everything that sparks controversy.

last edited at Jun 8, 2017 8:59AM

joined May 11, 2014

I wouldn't say that loli by definition means lolita-complex, because there's also the element of moe within loli characters, which in my understanding of the term comes from the desire of the reader to protect the character and wanting them to succeed in their endeavors. But this is kinda hot in all the wrong ways while also being hilariously controversial, shame though SJWs want to ban everything that sparks controversy.

"ALL THE PEOPLE WHO TOOK ISSUE ARE SJWS AND WANT THINGS BANNED" Oh fuck don't strawman like that, you'll just give the complainers ammo

last edited at Jun 8, 2017 9:14AM

W
joined Jun 5, 2015

Deus posted:

I wouldn't say that loli by definition means lolita-complex

But it does. Lolicon is a abbreviation of phrase Lolita Complex which was originally took exactly the way it means here, but then lolis become popular and it become it's own thing, but the original meaning is still there.

last edited at Jun 8, 2017 10:15AM

1385408507407
joined May 4, 2013

^Yet it's legit two words, I prefer the more differentiated definition.

But SJW see problem where there actually is none,
or think their taste=law. This manga isn't a problem.

last edited at Jun 8, 2017 10:59AM

Nezchan Moderator
Meiling%20bun%20150px
joined Jun 28, 2012

^Yet it's legit two words, I prefer the more differentiated definition.

But SJW see problem where there actually is none,
or think their taste=law. This manga isn't a problem.

Take the "SJW" nonsense to Reddit where it belongs, please.

Sharkexpert12
2017-06-09-10-36-16-
joined Mar 29, 2017

There's really no exception with rule 34, huh? ._.

This isn't even unexpected what is crazy is there is stuff of 4 boneing the number 3.

joined Jun 7, 2017

^Yet it's legit two words, I prefer the more differentiated definition.

But SJW see problem where there actually is none,
or think their taste=law. This manga isn't a problem.

Completely... look at me saying right away that I want everything banned.

I've gone through so many lolis and never said anything because while not my favorite thing, they didn't rub me the wrong way. This one rubbed me in a very bad way (and I did read the manga) and I expressed it just like a few other people did without being rude or throwing insults.

What do you do? WAHWAH!!! SJW!!!

I'm going to quote Nezchan because it's true:

Take the "SJW" nonsense to Reddit where it belongs, please.

last edited at Jun 8, 2017 6:27PM

1385408507407
joined May 4, 2013

^Yet it's legit two words, I prefer the more differentiated definition.

But SJW see problem where there actually is none,
or think their taste=law. This manga isn't a problem.

Completely... look at me saying right away that I want everything banned.

I've gone through so many lolis and never said anything because while not my favorite thing, they didn't rub me the wrong way. This one rubbed me in a very bad way (and I did read the manga) and I expressed it just like a few other people did without being rude or throwing insults.

What do you do? WAHWAH!!! SJW!!!

I'm going to quote Nezchan because it's true:

Take the "SJW" nonsense to Reddit where it belongs, please.

Ye, sorry for suggesting otherwise.
I don't like how these replies stack in length.

Also thought it meant something like So-..rcery Juvanile Wizard, I'll stop now.

last edited at Jun 8, 2017 6:32PM

Nezchan Moderator
Meiling%20bun%20150px
joined Jun 28, 2012

Also thought it meant something like So-..rcery Juvanile Wizard, I'll stop now.

That would be lovely, thank you.

joined May 11, 2014

^Yet it's legit two words, I prefer the more differentiated definition.

But SJW see problem where there actually is none,
or think their taste=law. This manga isn't a problem.

Completely... look at me saying right away that I want everything banned.

I've gone through so many lolis and never said anything because while not my favorite thing, they didn't rub me the wrong way. This one rubbed me in a very bad way (and I did read the manga) and I expressed it just like a few other people did without being rude or throwing insults.

What do you do? WAHWAH!!! SJW!!!

I'm going to quote Nezchan because it's true:

Take the "SJW" nonsense to Reddit where it belongs, please.

That guy's comment was bad but so are yours. You're the guy who made the "please remove this" comment on the last page after all. You don't want it banned but you do want it taken down and that's still questionable.

If you're so desperate to keep Maid Dragon sacred and away from underage sexualization then go complain at the author who actively promotes drawing erotic art of Kanna and has done it himself time and time again. Or go read Yotsuba or some other manga with a legitimately "pure" little girl character and not one that was intended to be fetishized from the get-go (no, really, I wasn't serious earlier; don't go and bother the author).

This stuff is just silly and the fact that you did read the manga makes it even moreso. This "pure Kanna" thing likely started as an ironic meme or troll and then somehow people started believing it. Now you have people reacting the way they did in this thread to the natural result of portraying a character the way the author did.

last edited at Jun 9, 2017 6:23AM

Img_0469
joined Sep 9, 2016

WHY WOULD.YOU LEWD LOLIS OMFG THE BEST LOLI AT THAT WHYYYYY WE'RE ALL.GOING TO HELL

1385408507407
joined May 4, 2013

Guys calm down, it's not like there's an overage person involved, they're both lolis so it's fine.

W
joined Jun 5, 2015

Deus posted:

Guys calm down, it's not like there's an overage person involved, they're both lolis so it's fine.

It's fine because it is just damn fiction...

62342532_p4_3
joined May 27, 2015

Deus posted:

Guys calm down, it's not like there's an overage person involved, they're both lolis so it's fine.

It's fine because it is just damn fiction...

No, it's not! This shit needs to be taken down! I don't like loli, but I looked at it anyway (or didn't) so I can come to the comments section, complain about it, and scream "DROPPED!" or "BORING!"

/s

last edited at Jun 9, 2017 1:44PM

joined May 11, 2014

WHY WOULD.YOU LEWD LOLIS

stop sexualizing sex

1385408507407
joined May 4, 2013

Deus posted:

Guys calm down, it's not like there's an overage person involved, they're both lolis so it's fine.

It's fine because it is just damn fiction...

No, it's not! This shit needs to be taken down! I don't like loli, but I looked at it anyway (or didn't) so I can come to the comments section, complain about it, and scream "DROPPED!" or "BORING!"

/s

Waht? I'm sorry but that train of thought was so retarded, please tell me you're tossing irony around you
like a water fountain and I failed to comprehend it, in which case stop using sarcasm in written text,
it's a very ambiguous way of putting your oppinion.

Yuu
joined Mar 28, 2015

Deus posted:
Waht? I'm sorry but that train of thought was so retarded, please tell me you're tossing irony around you
like a water fountain and I failed to comprehend it, in which case stop using sarcasm in written text,
it's a very ambiguous way of putting your oppinion.

What part of the /s didn't you understand?

W
joined Jun 5, 2015

Nya-chan posted:

Deus posted:
Waht? I'm sorry but that train of thought was so retarded, please tell me you're tossing irony around you
like a water fountain and I failed to comprehend it, in which case stop using sarcasm in written text,
it's a very ambiguous way of putting your oppinion.

What part of the /s didn't you understand?

Probably the "/s" part

joined Jun 7, 2017

That guy's comment was bad but so are yours. You're the guy who made the "please remove this" comment on the last page after all. You don't want it banned but you do want it taken down and that's still questionable.

If you're so desperate to keep Maid Dragon sacred and away from underage sexualization then go complain at the author who actively promotes drawing erotic art of Kanna and has done it himself time and time again. Or go read Yotsuba or some other manga with a legitimately "pure" little girl character and not one that was intended to be fetishized from the get-go (no, really, I wasn't serious earlier; don't go and bother the author).

This stuff is just silly and the fact that you did read the manga makes it even moreso. This "pure Kanna" thing likely started as an ironic meme or troll and then somehow people started believing it. Now you have people reacting the way they did in this thread to the natural result of portraying a character the way the author did.

Please remove =/= I demand to remove.
Learn the difference between making a polite request (that may or may not be obliged) and making demands.

I'm not desperate to keep anything sacred or whatever stories you concocted in your head. Kindly don't put words in my mouth or act as if you know what I'm thinking.
This didn't rub me wrong because it's Dragon Maid; it simply rubbed me wrong in general, the end. I have a threshold for loli and this particular Doujin went way overboard in my case. I have the right to express my opinion, even if you don't like it.

Do you see me kicking up a stink because it's still up? No.
Do you see me cry around because it's still up? No.
Am I attacking anyone in here for liking it? No.

What I do see is people kicking up a stink because some of us got rubbed the wrong way by this Doujin and dared to say so.

W
joined Jun 5, 2015

tulituli posted:

Please remove =/= I demand to remove.

Doesn't change how ridiculous that request is. And even if it is made politely, are you trying to tell me you made it not expecting it to be fulfilled? It is still a demand, even if made politely. Not to mention childish, I didn't like something so remove it from site because I didn't like it, doesn't matter maybe others enjoy it and I don't have to read it again or didn't have to read it in the first place, I still want it to be gone from this site so it doesn't have something I don't like. Nobody cares how much stuff you tolerated before finally asking to remove something. It's still based only on your sensibility and what you think should not be allowed on site and you are clearly not the person who gets to decided it, as it was uploaded her in the first place. So yes, no matter how you word it, you are still demanding site to be run according with your own sensibilities.

joined Jun 7, 2017

Doesn't change how ridiculous... blablabla, putting words in my mouth, blablabla.

I actually didn't think it would be fulfilled, simply because there are people that like it. It's still not forbidden for me to express myself just because someone might not like what I have to say.

The only childish people here are the ones attacking those who said "this is wrong".

And seriously, it's getting idiotic the lengths you're going just to make it look like I'm demanding that this place be ran by what I like. If that were the case, 2/3 of the contents of the site wouldn't even be here.

Unless you wish to engage in proper discussion instead of this idiocy, I'm done.

Soralaylaff
joined Oct 16, 2013

The comments sections on these types of manga never fail to entertain.

I always feel a bit icky when it's an adult with a minor (I still read it cuz I read everything), but since they're both lolis, it's whatevs to me. It's just fiction and as long as none of us here actually start laying our paws on real life lolis, what's the harm?

1385408507407
joined May 4, 2013

^I find them pretty tumorous.

And /s? Don't make up your own silly languages talking to others.
It could mean soapy butthole for all I care and I'd still not get it.

W
joined Jun 5, 2015

Deus posted:

^I find them pretty tumorous.

And /s? Don't make up your own silly languages talking to others.
It could mean soapy butthole for all I care and I'd still not get it.

It's not made up language. It's a internet shortcut for sarcasm, some people started to use exactly for people like you who can't tell when someone is not serious.

To reply you must either login or sign up.