Yisus!! finally...
Ahhh my script is ded... oh no

Yisus!! finally...
Ahhh my script is ded... oh no

Your script is dead?

Michykat posted:

Yisus!! finally...
Ahhh my script is ded... oh no

Your script is dead?

Off topic: Just got some random message from tampermonkey and then the dynasty reader script stopped working, tried re-starting the browser and still didn't work...But now is working again, for some reason so, all good I guess.

Michykat posted:

Yisus!! finally...
Ahhh my script is ded... oh no

Your script is dead?

Off topic: Just got some random message from tampermonkey and then the dynasty reader script stopped working, tried re-starting the browser and still didn't work...But now is working again, for some reason so, all good I guess.

Awesome sauce!

So I just saw Taiyaki post ch preview on pixiv and there is a picture of Miyuki Senpai as a child with another child and I'm going to assume it's about her past forbidden love, as in her sister..? Since she understood and didn't freak out about Asuka's forbidden love for her mother dearest. I mean it's still a huge jump but that's what my mind thought of immediately.

So I just saw Taiyaki post ch preview on pixiv and there is a picture of Miyuki Senpai as a child with another child and I'm going to assume it's about her past forbidden love, as in her sister..? Since she understood and didn't freak out about Asuka's forbidden love for her mother dearest. I mean it's still a huge jump but that's what my mind thought of immediately.

So we might get siscon shenanigans?! Heck, that's looks to good to be true.

So I just saw Taiyaki post ch preview on pixiv and there is a picture of Miyuki Senpai as a child with another child and I'm going to assume it's about her past forbidden love, as in her sister..? Since she understood and didn't freak out about Asuka's forbidden love for her mother dearest. I mean it's still a huge jump but that's what my mind thought of immediately.

So we might get siscon shenanigans?! Heck, that's looks to good to be true.

Calm down Mochi

president: haha did i tease you too much ;)
asuka, looking like she's about to kill herself:

president: haha did i tease you too much ;)
asuka, looking like she's about to kill herself:

You mean look like to get wet herself.

Miyuki is a slut. nothing more, nothing less. No need to argue with me here.

is she bi?

Miyuki is a slut. nothing more, nothing less. No need to argue with me here.

is she bi?

Those two things are really not connected.

Miyuki is a slut. nothing more, nothing less. No need to argue with me here.

Are you actually trying to play the slut-shaming card in the current year.

Miyuki is a slut. nothing more, nothing less. No need to argue with me here.

Are you actually trying to play the slut-shaming card in the current year.

It's certainly nothing to be proud of, especially when she exploits people.

Miyuki is a slut. nothing more, nothing less. No need to argue with me here.

Are you actually trying to play the slut-shaming card in the current year.

It's certainly nothing to be proud of

Nae fuck your rake shaming. The son of King David had ten thousand wives and his wisdom was highly regarded.

Miyuki is a slut. nothing more, nothing less. No need to argue with me here.

Are you actually trying to play the slut-shaming card in the current year.

It's certainly nothing to be proud of, especially when she exploits people.

Quoth yourself,

Those two things are really not connected.

It's certainly nothing to be proud of, especially when she exploits people.

Quoth yourself,

Those two things are really not connected.

Except that is not applicable. I'm specifically saying that she is an exploitative slut.
And that nobody will be proud of it either way. It's just an unhinged way of life. Some people prefer it.

last edited at Oct 3, 2019 12:53PM

And that nobody will be proud of it either way. It's just an unhinged way of life. Some people prefer it.

"Promiscuity: an unhinged way of life."
Did I accidentally walk into the incelforums or what. Being manipulative is one thing, but nothing about being proud that you're fine with multiple partners is "unhinged" so long as you're not a toxic ass about it.

"Promiscuity: an unhinged way of life."
Did I accidentally walk into the incelforums or what. Being manipulative is one thing, but nothing about being proud that you're fine with multiple partners is "unhinged" so long as you're not a toxic ass about it.

Sleeping around always ends badly. Always. It's just a statistical inevitability. Whether its a sexual disease, a bad partner who does something violent or whatever else you can think of. Announcing it to everyone and getting a reputation for it ruins your social life in the long run too.

It's a lifestyle choice and of course you can live comfortably with it, but it is still rather unhinged. Like only eating junkfood or cutting yourself (emo kids are also proud to show that off). I won't stop anyone who is into it, but nobody will look at that and say "Wow, they should be proud of that".

Was that copied verbatim from the young republicans' rant on why gay pride needs to be ended or was that just a happy accident?
You might get an STD or an abusive partner? That's literally half the anti-gay lines from the 90's, and it's got just as much reverse causality here as it did then. The fact that such lifestyles are marginalized is what causes that by limiting access and willingness to use resources to combat STDs and abuse, not the other way around. Coming out ruins your social life? Is there even a worse excuse for not being proud of your lifestyle? You can track that back to fucking miscegenation arguments. This is some whole fucking body control bullshit.

Like only eating junkfood or cutting yourself (emo kids are also proud to show that off).

Those aren't even closely related to each other none the less this, but neither of those are things to be ashamed of either or not proud of so long as it's not toxic. "Emo kids" too, that's some LUG style nonsense.
This all reads like those cunty "what do they have to be proud of, why can't there be straight pride" trashspews, go fuck yourself and your essentialism.

The way (some) people here manage to jump headfirst into stuffy Victorian moralism without even noticing never ceases to amaze, disappoint and amuse me in equal measure.

Was that copied verbatim from the young republicans' rant on why gay pride needs to be ended or was that just a happy accident?

Wow, you're really good at beating that strawman. I make no difference between homo or heterosexual in this situation. I don't stop anyone from being a slut or a manwhore and I don't shame them either. You are just full of it.
Anyone can be proud of anything, but that is not reality and never will be. Perhaps promiscuity will be normalized one day alongside polygamy and whatever else, but the consequences of that lifestyle exist right now and that's a fact.

Those aren't even closely related to each other none the less this, but neither of those are things to be ashamed of either or not proud of so long as it's not toxic. "Emo kids" too, that's some LUG style nonsense.
This all reads like those cunty "what do they have to be proud of, why can't there be straight pride" trashspews, go fuck yourself and your essentialism.

These things (junkfood enthusiasm and emo cutters) are related in so far that they have averse consequences on your life and you can easily avoid them. It's your lifestyle choice unlike a sexuality or something you were born with. So please, go away with your false equivalencies and appeals to outrage culture. You can't turn this on me.

The way (some) people here manage to jump headfirst into stuffy Victorian moralism without even noticing never ceases to amaze, disappoint and amuse me in equal measure.

Morals were never a factor as far as I'm concerned. Aside from manipulating and hurting people of course, like Miyuki does.

last edited at Oct 3, 2019 2:38PM

The way (some) people here manage to jump headfirst into stuffy Victorian moralism without even noticing never ceases to amaze, disappoint and amuse me in equal measure.

Morals were never a factor as far as I'm concerned.

You sure spend a lot of words condemning her "slutty" habits for that. Nevermind now parroting about verbatim the usual checklist Moral Guardian types tend to level against nigh any sexual behaviour outside whatever particular narrow stripe they find to be acceptable; I'm slightly disappointed at the lack of "think of the children!" there to be honest.

Now Miyuki's conduct towards Asuka can certainly disagreed with already on basis of the latter's age and not at all helped by the former's position as a surrogate big sister of sorts, but this and that are two quite separate matters.

Aside from manipulating and hurting people of course, like Miyuki does.

I suppose the former would be guilty as charged already by the default that "seduction" certainly falls under the rubric of interpersonal manipulation; the latter would be rather debatable and require citing what you think implies she's intentionally doing so just for starters.

Where is the person who asked for the author to write reptile lady harem yuri? I'd rather read more about that than read about posts shaming people for their sexual history.

Sleeping around always ends badly. Always. It's just a statistical inevitability.

[Citation needed] methinks.

Whether its a sexual disease, a bad partner who does something violent or whatever else you can think of.

The track record of more monogamous behaviour is pretty lousy in that regard too so this seems like an awfully weak argument to make...

Announcing it to everyone and getting a reputation for it ruins your social life in the long run too.

Last I checked she didn't do the former and as for the latter, well, sexually active girls catch that stigma awfully easy anyway; surely it won't be necessary to read out the stud/slut double standard to you? Though I'm wondering if you're quite aware that you're actively contributing to sustaining the latter here...

Was that copied verbatim from the young republicans' rant on why gay pride needs to be ended or was that just a happy accident?

Wow, you're really good at beating that strawman. I make no difference between homo or heterosexual in this situation. I don't stop anyone from being a slut or a manwhore and I don't shame them either. You are just full of it.

A "strawman" argument is attacking a viewpoint not espoused by the person making the initial argument. Comparing the similarities in your argument with another group's bullshit a strawman is not. I addressed the points you directly made, come up with a better retort. Saying someone shouldn't be proud is shaming them even if it is not to their face. The point is that your viewpoint is as stuck up as the anti-gay movement in the 90s and that recycling the exact arguments they had then does not lend credence to it.

Anyone can be proud of anything, but that is not reality and never will be. Perhaps promiscuity will be normalized one day alongside polygamy and whatever else, but the consequences of that lifestyle exist right now and that's a fact.

The idea that someone shoudln't be proud of something because there are social consequences is bullshit. That is the whole fucking point of pride, the courage it takes to stand up to essentialism and bullshit and be proud despite it. That in spite of the same tired fearmongering you stand up and say that this is your lifestyle and you're not changing it for blowhards.

Those aren't even closely related to each other none the less this, but neither of those are things to be ashamed of either or not proud of so long as it's not toxic. "Emo kids" too, that's some LUG style nonsense.
This all reads like those cunty "what do they have to be proud of, why can't there be straight pride" trashspews, go fuck yourself and your essentialism.

These things (junkfood enthusiasm and emo cutters) are related in so far that they have averse consequences on your life and you can easily avoid them. It's your lifestyle choice unlike a sexuality or something you were born with.

First off cutting and eating disorders can very much be caused mental issues someone is born with, even promiscuity can be part of someone's sex addiction which as most addiction is not something someone can control. More importantly there is no false equivalency here, the line about homosexuality being a negative "lifestyle choice" with consequences like AIDS has always been a big assault on homosexuals. Beyond just being gay the idea of the "homosexual lifestyle" being something people should not be proud of is a huge issue. Even if these were all choices none of them are things that someone should be ashamed of anymore than anyone else. Why should someone be proud to have a stable single relationship? Or be proud of being vegan? Or of being good at videogames? Certainly all choices, many with destructive side effects, but saying any of these should not give someone pride so long as they don't view them toxically would be very insulting.

So please, go away with your false equivalencies and appeals to outrage culture. You can't turn this on me.

I have never heard someone use the term "outrage culture" who wasn't just trying to excuse being a cunt. The idea that someone's lifestyle is shameful because you disagree with it, worse because it socially unacceptable, is incredibly toxic. "False equivalencies" only works if they're, you know, false. Simply because the subject is different does not make it unfit, that is the whole point of equivalency. You actually brought up STDs and domestic violence being the result of someone's lifestyle (which saying that about DV is so very far beyond the pale it is physically revolting but I digress), this is so literally close to the Regan era talking points on "homosexual lifestyles" that being any closer would get you a hotel stay with a chimpanzee.