
I love how this shitty strawman argument that is not refuting anything always come out in these discussions. You know you have a strong case when your first line of defense is an strawman.
Murder require an action - murdering someone in real world . You don't call someone murderer if they didn't murder someone yet (or at least attempt). I can have an "dream", "wish" or even simulate (like in game) to kill someone, but it doesn't make me an murder by any metric.
Being pedophile require just an attraction to children. You are consider "pedophile" if you want to fuck children. That's it. The same with any sexuality. You are considered straight if you are attracted to someone of opposite sex even if you never had sex in your life. The same with being gay, pan or anything else. If you are attracted to fictional or real opposite/same sex character/person you are still straight/gay. Most of you people seemingly cannot differentiate between "being pedophile" (attraction toward children) and "pedophiliac behavior" (molesting/rape/other sexual behavior toward children).
Like, imagine how moronic this "it's not real person" argument looks in reality. You would have a guy showing you image of naked "loli" start talking how much he wish to fuck her, how her body is "perfect shape" how "little girls have tightest pussies", how much he wish he could have a loli to fuck on his own, how much he wish he could do these things with his little sister/cousin/gradeschooler etc. (all these comments are actual comments under "loli" shit). And there he goes: "Oh but I'm not a pedophile". Like, it's pure insanity. It's like someone show you image of a dog, just as a drawing instead of a photo, tell you they find it sexy, wants to fuck it and you would go "Yep, not a zoophile".
Some of you really not making favours in refuting people "concerns" about connection between LGBT+ and pedophilia.
Honestly I already got bored with this. I know I not gonna convince people who are lying to themselves.
last edited at Jan 2, 2026 10:22AM