I wouldn't say that loli by definition means lolita-complex, because there's also the element of moe within loli characters, which in my understanding of the term comes from the desire of the reader to protect the character and wanting them to succeed in their endeavors. But this is kinda hot in all the wrong ways while also being hilariously controversial, shame though SJWs want to ban everything that sparks controversy.

"ALL THE PEOPLE WHO TOOK ISSUE ARE SJWS AND WANT THINGS BANNED" Oh fuck don't strawman like that, you'll just give the complainers ammo

last edited at Jun 8, 2017 9:14AM

Deus posted:

I wouldn't say that loli by definition means lolita-complex

But it does. Lolicon is a abbreviation of phrase Lolita Complex which was originally took exactly the way it means here, but then lolis become popular and it become it's own thing, but the original meaning is still there.

last edited at Jun 8, 2017 10:15AM

^Yet it's legit two words, I prefer the more differentiated definition.

But SJW see problem where there actually is none,
or think their taste=law. This manga isn't a problem.

last edited at Jun 8, 2017 10:59AM

^Yet it's legit two words, I prefer the more differentiated definition.

But SJW see problem where there actually is none,
or think their taste=law. This manga isn't a problem.

Take the "SJW" nonsense to Reddit where it belongs, please.

There's really no exception with rule 34, huh? ._.

This isn't even unexpected what is crazy is there is stuff of 4 boneing the number 3.

^Yet it's legit two words, I prefer the more differentiated definition.

But SJW see problem where there actually is none,
or think their taste=law. This manga isn't a problem.

Completely... look at me saying right away that I want everything banned.

I've gone through so many lolis and never said anything because while not my favorite thing, they didn't rub me the wrong way. This one rubbed me in a very bad way (and I did read the manga) and I expressed it just like a few other people did without being rude or throwing insults.

What do you do? WAHWAH!!! SJW!!!

I'm going to quote Nezchan because it's true:

Take the "SJW" nonsense to Reddit where it belongs, please.

last edited at Jun 8, 2017 6:27PM

^Yet it's legit two words, I prefer the more differentiated definition.

But SJW see problem where there actually is none,
or think their taste=law. This manga isn't a problem.

Completely... look at me saying right away that I want everything banned.

I've gone through so many lolis and never said anything because while not my favorite thing, they didn't rub me the wrong way. This one rubbed me in a very bad way (and I did read the manga) and I expressed it just like a few other people did without being rude or throwing insults.

What do you do? WAHWAH!!! SJW!!!

I'm going to quote Nezchan because it's true:

Take the "SJW" nonsense to Reddit where it belongs, please.

Ye, sorry for suggesting otherwise.
I don't like how these replies stack in length.

Also thought it meant something like So-..rcery Juvanile Wizard, I'll stop now.

last edited at Jun 8, 2017 6:32PM

Also thought it meant something like So-..rcery Juvanile Wizard, I'll stop now.

That would be lovely, thank you.

^Yet it's legit two words, I prefer the more differentiated definition.

But SJW see problem where there actually is none,
or think their taste=law. This manga isn't a problem.

Completely... look at me saying right away that I want everything banned.

I've gone through so many lolis and never said anything because while not my favorite thing, they didn't rub me the wrong way. This one rubbed me in a very bad way (and I did read the manga) and I expressed it just like a few other people did without being rude or throwing insults.

What do you do? WAHWAH!!! SJW!!!

I'm going to quote Nezchan because it's true:

Take the "SJW" nonsense to Reddit where it belongs, please.

That guy's comment was bad but so are yours. You're the guy who made the "please remove this" comment on the last page after all. You don't want it banned but you do want it taken down and that's still questionable.

If you're so desperate to keep Maid Dragon sacred and away from underage sexualization then go complain at the author who actively promotes drawing erotic art of Kanna and has done it himself time and time again. Or go read Yotsuba or some other manga with a legitimately "pure" little girl character and not one that was intended to be fetishized from the get-go (no, really, I wasn't serious earlier; don't go and bother the author).

This stuff is just silly and the fact that you did read the manga makes it even moreso. This "pure Kanna" thing likely started as an ironic meme or troll and then somehow people started believing it. Now you have people reacting the way they did in this thread to the natural result of portraying a character the way the author did.

last edited at Jun 9, 2017 6:23AM

WHY WOULD.YOU LEWD LOLIS OMFG THE BEST LOLI AT THAT WHYYYYY WE'RE ALL.GOING TO HELL

Guys calm down, it's not like there's an overage person involved, they're both lolis so it's fine.

Deus posted:

Guys calm down, it's not like there's an overage person involved, they're both lolis so it's fine.

It's fine because it is just damn fiction...

Deus posted:

Guys calm down, it's not like there's an overage person involved, they're both lolis so it's fine.

It's fine because it is just damn fiction...

No, it's not! This shit needs to be taken down! I don't like loli, but I looked at it anyway (or didn't) so I can come to the comments section, complain about it, and scream "DROPPED!" or "BORING!"

/s

last edited at Jun 9, 2017 1:44PM

WHY WOULD.YOU LEWD LOLIS

stop sexualizing sex

Deus posted:

Guys calm down, it's not like there's an overage person involved, they're both lolis so it's fine.

It's fine because it is just damn fiction...

No, it's not! This shit needs to be taken down! I don't like loli, but I looked at it anyway (or didn't) so I can come to the comments section, complain about it, and scream "DROPPED!" or "BORING!"

/s

Waht? I'm sorry but that train of thought was so retarded, please tell me you're tossing irony around you
like a water fountain and I failed to comprehend it, in which case stop using sarcasm in written text,
it's a very ambiguous way of putting your oppinion.

Deus posted:
Waht? I'm sorry but that train of thought was so retarded, please tell me you're tossing irony around you
like a water fountain and I failed to comprehend it, in which case stop using sarcasm in written text,
it's a very ambiguous way of putting your oppinion.

What part of the /s didn't you understand?

Nya-chan posted:

Deus posted:
Waht? I'm sorry but that train of thought was so retarded, please tell me you're tossing irony around you
like a water fountain and I failed to comprehend it, in which case stop using sarcasm in written text,
it's a very ambiguous way of putting your oppinion.

What part of the /s didn't you understand?

Probably the "/s" part

That guy's comment was bad but so are yours. You're the guy who made the "please remove this" comment on the last page after all. You don't want it banned but you do want it taken down and that's still questionable.

If you're so desperate to keep Maid Dragon sacred and away from underage sexualization then go complain at the author who actively promotes drawing erotic art of Kanna and has done it himself time and time again. Or go read Yotsuba or some other manga with a legitimately "pure" little girl character and not one that was intended to be fetishized from the get-go (no, really, I wasn't serious earlier; don't go and bother the author).

This stuff is just silly and the fact that you did read the manga makes it even moreso. This "pure Kanna" thing likely started as an ironic meme or troll and then somehow people started believing it. Now you have people reacting the way they did in this thread to the natural result of portraying a character the way the author did.

Please remove =/= I demand to remove.
Learn the difference between making a polite request (that may or may not be obliged) and making demands.

I'm not desperate to keep anything sacred or whatever stories you concocted in your head. Kindly don't put words in my mouth or act as if you know what I'm thinking.
This didn't rub me wrong because it's Dragon Maid; it simply rubbed me wrong in general, the end. I have a threshold for loli and this particular Doujin went way overboard in my case. I have the right to express my opinion, even if you don't like it.

Do you see me kicking up a stink because it's still up? No.
Do you see me cry around because it's still up? No.
Am I attacking anyone in here for liking it? No.

What I do see is people kicking up a stink because some of us got rubbed the wrong way by this Doujin and dared to say so.

tulituli posted:

Please remove =/= I demand to remove.

Doesn't change how ridiculous that request is. And even if it is made politely, are you trying to tell me you made it not expecting it to be fulfilled? It is still a demand, even if made politely. Not to mention childish, I didn't like something so remove it from site because I didn't like it, doesn't matter maybe others enjoy it and I don't have to read it again or didn't have to read it in the first place, I still want it to be gone from this site so it doesn't have something I don't like. Nobody cares how much stuff you tolerated before finally asking to remove something. It's still based only on your sensibility and what you think should not be allowed on site and you are clearly not the person who gets to decided it, as it was uploaded her in the first place. So yes, no matter how you word it, you are still demanding site to be run according with your own sensibilities.

Doesn't change how ridiculous... blablabla, putting words in my mouth, blablabla.

I actually didn't think it would be fulfilled, simply because there are people that like it. It's still not forbidden for me to express myself just because someone might not like what I have to say.

The only childish people here are the ones attacking those who said "this is wrong".

And seriously, it's getting idiotic the lengths you're going just to make it look like I'm demanding that this place be ran by what I like. If that were the case, 2/3 of the contents of the site wouldn't even be here.

Unless you wish to engage in proper discussion instead of this idiocy, I'm done.

The comments sections on these types of manga never fail to entertain.

I always feel a bit icky when it's an adult with a minor (I still read it cuz I read everything), but since they're both lolis, it's whatevs to me. It's just fiction and as long as none of us here actually start laying our paws on real life lolis, what's the harm?

^I find them pretty tumorous.

And /s? Don't make up your own silly languages talking to others.
It could mean soapy butthole for all I care and I'd still not get it.

Deus posted:

^I find them pretty tumorous.

And /s? Don't make up your own silly languages talking to others.
It could mean soapy butthole for all I care and I'd still not get it.

It's not made up language. It's a internet shortcut for sarcasm, some people started to use exactly for people like you who can't tell when someone is not serious.

I'd get it if someone uploaded a Yotsuba porn doujin and people said "this goes against her characterization". I think the core of the issue is that "KANNA MUST NOT BE SEXUALIZED" in particular is a forced meme from people who don't want to admit that the character was intended to be sexually attractive from the get-go.

And don't say "Kyoani thought the manga was gross and made her pure!"; Kyoani added in the shot of Kanna accidentally shoving her ass into Saikawa's face in the Twister scene. It wasn't even all that sexual originally. They specifically had her in a fetishy outfit in one of the specials.

last edited at Jun 10, 2017 1:45AM

And /s? Don't make up your own silly languages talking to others.

you must not go on the internet often if youve never seen "/s" before.