What are you even talking about
And notice the quotation marks?
Im asking if that short HitsugixChitaru scene from this doujin was canon.
If it's a doujin, it isn't canon :P That's why it's called a doujin xD Unless it's specifically said by the author that it's canon. Also, it's not even the original artist that drew the scene here.
Duuuude....
Minakata Sunao's art is pretty distinctive, I trust you can recognise it after some comparison with the original series
Also doujin = self published
Very often it's fanwork of existing series, but ofc we have artists releasing original work.
Each "Small Riddle of Evil" doujin has been released by Minakata Sunao (and sometimes Morishima) + fanart from other mangaka.
What's conflicting/ambiguous here, is that Minakata Sunao HAPPENS to be the actual artist of Akuma no Riddle, or something, releasing doujins of her own series, but it doesn't change that the original series is still a two person team.
A lot of the extras and shorts are quite jokingly written, and not to be taken seriously, but the discussed scene in particular had a different, more serious feeling to it, and actually adds to the event in the manga. It seems to me like it was meant to be taken seriously, extra narrative and information on what happened after the play.
I feel like, normally, if it was just one author, that the actual author is releasing doujins on their own series/pairings (and depending what the setting is I guess? Cus it could just be a long omake or something), it seems pretty canon. But from what I understand, it's ambiguous cus well, there are two authors. I wonder what Yun Kouga's take on it is, tho I can't imagine her being against it being canon, she probably reads the doujins, she contributed "guest artwork" for the doujins at least once
last edited at Oct 13, 2016 9:24PM