Faust posted:
Edit: Just in case, i was sarcastic about calling it "subtext" by the way. I wouldn't call ALL THAT GAY ASS SHIT subtext. Hence the quote marks.
On whole topic of subtext, I really hate how the meaning and use of the word changed. To me subtext is not less valid than text, because the whole reason it is called subtext is because there is some text in it. It's just not blatant and you have to be more observant to catch it (or get yuri vibes from everything gay like me). So yes, even if show isn't yuri and have just 1 character showing up some subtext, it isn't any less valid than show focused on romance, because w/e cynical or not, creators put it there so there is some text in their actions. At least that is how I look at it most of the time. W/e the intention, if to me character feels gay, then to me it is part of them. Seriously because of the whole "subtext is evil" and treating it as only queerbait unless they say otherwise, a lot good shows suffer, because people are too focused on wanting more from it than enjoying the things that show does have in itself. Best example from top of my head is Swap Swap, where the MC was gay af and there was a lot of subtext, and I was perfectly fine with it and interperting her as a lesbian without anyone having to confirm it to me, but there was a ton of "helpful" people bashing it, saying it is only subtext, and it will never go anywhere and they are straight (jokes on them, because I heard from friend later we got confirmation about at least 2 girls being actual couple). So yes, to me subtext means there is text, it is just done subtle. That being said...
Minutoh posted:
I just think it would have been better if they made it even more blatant than it actually is and actually said they were dating or whatever. I'm sure there are some who deny Cocona and Papika are together; in doing so, they pretty much misssed the entire point of the fucking series, but I don't think even the most hardcore idiots can deny that "yeah, we're gay and we're dating" means that THE CHARACTERS IN QUESTION ARE GAY AND THEY'RE DATING. I suppose you could argue that there's no need to hammer it into these people's heads, but I can't say that I'm not frustrated when someone completely misses all the subtext...
Pretty much this. I don't mind subtext, but there is really not enough shows that outright states or confirm couples in a way nobody can deny it. I'm tired of defending subtext shows and wish there were more where I don't have to convince people or say "it's not confirmed but it's pretty gay", because show itself would leave no room for interpretation. But I guess ignoring w/e yuri sells or not, until Japan change and finally start acknowledging homosexual relationships as something normal, I guess there is long time before it changes and we all know how slow and unwilling for change Japan is.
I used to be like that before I got into yuri, I missed all the Korrasami signs back when I was watching Korra (I wonder how different my reactions to their interactions would have been if Korra had aired after I had become a yuri fanatic...)
Korrasami is a whole other can of worms. You have no reason to feel bad for not catching it, because there was basically like one scene in entire series (ignoring ending) that had any subtext at all and suggested they start to feel attracted to each other. I had entire rant about it in other Korra thread, I can find it if you want.
Rain Spectre posted:
You know, it's incredible how much more attractive the Bhikhkuni girls are compared to the Mermaid girls. The Mermaid girls look...greasy.
My main 3 problems with Mermaid girls are: huge boobs, huge boobs and huge boobs. In that exact order.
Rain Spectre posted:
Still no idea why they had to make the games main pairing incestuous >>
I fail to find anything wrong with that.