Forum › FAQ, Help, & Suggestions (2022-)

__akiyama_mizuki_project_sekai_drawn_by_ririru__aef7569108d461f730828c198e920bc8_1_1_1_1_1
joined Mar 9, 2024

https://dynasty-scans.com/pairings/everyone_x_rin_1
https://dynasty-scans.com/pairings/everyone_x_rin
Two Everyone x Rin tag showed up during search, with no visual difference. Maybe renaming one of them ... (Love Live) or ... (Idolmaster)?


^ You can use the "upload request" function in the top right menu to request your comic being uploaded

last edited at Feb 10, 2026 12:33AM

Screenshot_15-9-2025_205514_dynasty-scans.com
joined Mar 31, 2023

My "To Read" list indicates I have two chapters to read but only one chapter is actually listed. Database issue?

last edited at Feb 10, 2026 9:44AM

52722-l
joined Nov 8, 2017

https://dynasty-scans.com/pairings/ichika_x_justice_task_force_member <-Can "Ichika x JTF Mob" be added as an alternative name?

Bambinessa
joined Aug 2, 2023
Image
joined Dec 21, 2017

Please can you delete my account thank you for any help

Screenshot_524_cropped
joined Jan 19, 2026

when requesting artwork to be uploaded, should we specify series or pairing tags? particularly if the pairing doesnt have a tag yet?

__akiyama_mizuki_project_sekai_drawn_by_ririru__aef7569108d461f730828c198e920bc8_1_1_1_1_1
joined Mar 9, 2024

when requesting artwork to be uploaded, should we specify series or pairing tags? particularly if the pairing doesnt have a tag yet?

Yeah I think mods can create tags that didn't exist yet.

__akiyama_mizuki_project_sekai_drawn_by_ririru__aef7569108d461f730828c198e920bc8_1_1_1_1_1
joined Mar 9, 2024
__akiyama_mizuki_project_sekai_drawn_by_ririru__aef7569108d461f730828c198e920bc8_1_1_1_1_1
joined Mar 9, 2024

https://dynasty-scans.com/authors/zuttomzen

This artist's twitter account no longer exist, but according to danbooru "zuttomzen" is an alias of the artist "gin (gin937)", and judging by the painting style it is pretty likely. What to do?

https://danbooru.donmai.us/artists/229756

__akiyama_mizuki_project_sekai_drawn_by_ririru__aef7569108d461f730828c198e920bc8_1_1_1_1_1
joined Mar 9, 2024

crypto spam 120954

Bambinessa
joined Aug 2, 2023

I have three proposals regarding tags:

Remove Moefication

An old and forgotten tag with a grand total of 4 one-shots and 1 series to its name, and imho neither useful nor descriptive: What's "moefication" even supposed to mean? All possible meanings are already covered by Anthropomorphization, Chibi or Moe up the butt? And I couldn't tell why Junjou Eccentric Honey Face is on the list, but something like Tuna-chan Wants To Be Eaten isn't.

Just take it behind the shed to avoid future confusion.

Add Perverted Heroine, Depraved Lesbian or something to that effect

Anything that covers a major character operating on the logic of an ecchi harem protagonist. Examples would be My Friend's Abnormally Cute Sister and I'm Way Better Than Him, Right?. This trope is usually in the overlap between Ecchi and Comedy, but not filterable in particular yet.

Marking such stories is a strong deterrent (for people who want to read a "serious" romance) and compellent (for people looking to read a fun romp) signal. Idk if the "10 occurrences" thing is actually a hard rule, but I'm sure we can satisfy that with some searching.

Add a Leash, Collar or Petplay tag

Petplay suggestion from 2024 | Petplay suggestion from 2018 | Debate about BDSM-ness from 2019

Rationale: the BDSM is being diluted with the very common kink of collaring (which seems to be perceived noticeably less "hardcore" than, say, paddling). That's both disappointing for people filtering for and filtering out BDSM.

For example, tagging Beware of Dog BDSM (it currently isn't) would be imho misleading, yet Chisato leading Takina around like that is the major appeal of the story.

I know rolling out that tag might seem daunting, and after the 49 Bloodshed suggestions from last October (not doing that again), I have prepared a 177-entries long annotated list of applicable targets to get you started and can share it as plaintext, JSON, CSV, custom XML or a haunted Minecraft world with Book and Quill in chests for each entry.

Me
joined Nov 6, 2021

https://dynasty-scans.com/images/37711 has the wrong pairing tag. Should be Kazuha x Chikaru instead of Kazuha x Renka.

27738462_1280_10000_277848~01~01
joined Jul 22, 2023

Hullo there, I'd like to put forward a coupla tag proposals I'd already shared with the forum a while back! I still think they'd be rather beneficial to us...

  • Aquarium [visit] - aquariums as a setting for dates are still going strong in yuri works. This tag would be a fine addition to the tag-pantheon of yuri tropes;
  • Kissing practice (or variations thereof) - pretty self-explanatory, also going strong, especially in them school life works.
Nanohaexceedsava
joined Jan 27, 2021

Hello, could someone please change my username to "freedomseekr"? Thanks!

Licentious Lantern
Lantern%202
joined Sep 17, 2021

Can Forum Rule 10 be abused to kill off any disagreements on claims or discussion of something that is tagged in the work?

For example, if something is tagged futanari, am I not allowed to say anything negative about futanari content in the work, even if it's a statement about the quality or a refutation of someone's claim on said content?
Furthermore, if a work has several tags and topics, is it not acceptable that someone may praise one aspect relating to a tag and show dismay on another's inclusion?

To me this just appears like slippery slope if used in such vague terms. This would be a handwave rule made for the sole purpose of shutting anyone's opinions or thoughts down when the mod in question feels like it that day. To mention that one dislikes the tag or how it is used in the work is not offensive to other parties or affects them in any way. I may give more weight to repeated spam for the sole reason of complaining about a tag, but that would require the tag to be the sole focus of such rants and to have them not relate to the actual subject matter being discussed.

last edited at Mar 25, 2026 11:02AM

__akiyama_mizuki_project_sekai_drawn_by_ririru__aef7569108d461f730828c198e920bc8_1_1_1_1_1
joined Mar 9, 2024

^ You certainly can complain about futanari work not drawn as nice as it should be, or it missing something, or maybe even the dick should be grown on the other girl instead of portrayed in work.

But you're complaining about the existence of futanari under a futanari comic. You saw the futa tag, decided you do not like it but nevertheless fine to went along with it. And then you read the work and decided it's not and decided to let everyone (who's likely enjoying futa works) know you have problem with futa... Why, even?

__mioda_ibuki_danganronpa_and_super_danganronpa_2_drawn_by_qosic__sample
Dynasty Scans
joined Oct 8, 2010

Can Forum Rule 10 be abused to kill off any disagreements on claims or discussion of something that is tagged in the work?

For example, if something is tagged futanari, am I not allowed to say anything negative about futanari content in the work, even if it's a statement about the quality or a refutation of someone's claim on said content?
Furthermore, if a work has several tags and topics, is it not acceptable that someone may praise one aspect relating to a tag and show dismay on another's inclusion?

To me this just appears like slippery slope if used in such vague terms. This would be a handwave rule made for the sole purpose of shutting anyone's opinions or thoughts down when the mod in question feels like it that day. To mention that one dislikes the tag or how it is used in the work is not offensive to other parties or affects them in any way. I may give more weight to repeated spam for the sole reason of complaining about a tag, but that would require the tag to be the sole focus of such rants and to have them not relate to the actual subject matter being discussed.

Trying to veil complaints about futanari content as valid criticisms is still complaining works that are properly tagged as such. You're trying to split hairs over being against an author choosing to depict futanari content or something close to it. Either way it is tagged as such, and continuing to complain about it is breaking rule 10. You've been told to drop it already; if you disagree still, you can leave through your volition or ours.

Licentious Lantern
Lantern%202
joined Sep 17, 2021

^ You certainly can complain about futanari work not drawn as nice as it should be, or it missing something, or maybe even the dick should be grown on the other girl instead of portrayed in work.

But you're complaining about the existence of futanari under a futanari comic. You saw the futa tag, decided you do not like it but nevertheless fine to went along with it. And then you read the work and decided it's not and decided to let everyone (who's likely enjoying futa works) know you have problem with futa... Why, even?

My question was of a general nature, not limited to my actual posts themselves.
And to be clear, so you can't just frame it in your prefered narrative, the work itself was NOT just futanari. It was a compilation of art where MOST were not futanari related at all. Indeed, it was merely tagged on in individual pictures.

And no, I will not quietly let you attempt to make it seem like one can only discuss a tag in a way that is positive towards the tag itself being in the work, just with different tastes on how it is integrated. That is too convenient for you.

Trying to veil complaints about futanari content as valid criticisms is still complaining works that are properly tagged as such. You're trying to split hairs over being against an author choosing to depict futanari content or something close to it. Either way it is tagged as such, and continuing to complain about it is breaking rule 10. You've been told to drop it already; if you disagree still, you can leave through your volition or ours.

So instead of actually engaging with my question, in the thread about explaining rules and questions, you choose to threaten me? Is this what the moderation on this site has stooped to?
Not even considering that perhaps it is the rule that is badly worded or thought out and instead blindly enforcing it at the convenience of whatever you prefer... that is indeed a slippery slope.

I am not splitting hairs, this is a fundamental issue that should be considered. I am well aware why this rule was added. It's because the mods got tired of people complaining about het works being added to the site on het releases. This was an inevitable consequence of pushing het content on what is universally perceived as a yuri site and I think giving yourself a nuke button in response to the majority telling you their opinion was probably the laziest solution.
But this is not the same thing.

One of your mods used this rule to pretend that me giving contra to someone saying that the character would totally do something related to the tag is not allowed.
The poster I replied to just before this has repeatedly tried to push the narrative that one cannot say anything negative about the inclusion of a tag or topic despite it being completely normal to engage with the content of a work in such ways.
This is the kind of culture you are fostering.

Let's use a different example. You got a work that is tagged both comedy and drama. I make a post about how I really love the comedy, but hate the drama of the work. Now you come along and tell me that it was tagged drama, so I have no right to say I dislike drama. Even though my comment simply engaged with the work, both positive and negative, you are resorting to shutting down everything unilaterally.
I find it concerning that this is not obviously a bad look to so many people here.

__akiyama_mizuki_project_sekai_drawn_by_ririru__aef7569108d461f730828c198e920bc8_1_1_1_1_1
joined Mar 9, 2024

^ You really are stubborn while trolling, huh.

if you disagree still, you can leave through your volition or ours.

To reply you must either login or sign up.