I'll never get enough of policewoman Reimu and Yukari.
But overall I am not much of a fan of how this was supposedly resolved, but first what I initially concluded before reading the spoilers above:
- Assuming Patchy didn't commit a miniscule amount of tomfoolery, there are 6 suspects: Remi, Flan, Aya, Meiling, Sakuya and Marisa
- We know the SDM is quite large, and crossing it on foot takes quite a while. We have confirmed mutual alibis for Meiling-Aya at 17:00 and Sakuya-Aya at 17:30. (Since ③ excludes any timestop shenenigans, it should be impossible to commit the murder and change in time for Sakuya).
- Remilia could not have left her room without being spotted by Sakuya before ToD.
- Marisa only arrived after time of death and is therefore cleared.
This would only leave Flandre without an alibi, and the "vampire puppeteering" Marisa proposed would make her capable of pulling off the locked-room trick. Which basically solved Problems 1, 2 and 4, leaving me to draw a blank on 3.
Now, as to why the actual solution sucks:
- Dictating from off-screen that no Youkai abilities were used is kind of ruining the fun, especially when you have a characters like Sakuya.
- The door was locked as confirmed by Sakuya. Even with both Meiling and Marisa lying, she has no reason to pretend that if it wasn't.
- Saying all entries and exit must pass the main gate is similarly silly in a setting where everybody can fly. It also means Marisa would have passed Meiling twice, with one time being just after her interview with Aya.
- If this happened as outlined in the spoilers above, the culprit's "plan" was highly dependent on luck, e.g. waiting out Meiling to pass her.
- There's literally no reason for Marisa to return to the scene of the murder. You could argue she forgot to erase her fingerprints from the book, but then why are Patchy's also missing?
- It additionally hinges on Meiling acting completely out of character to help hide the truth which imho skirts dangerously close to violating both facts ① and ④.
- Did the mangaka forgot about Koakuma?
- Gratuitous ass- and pantyshots
Also, the book is very clearly labelled عكاشة, which means Ukasha, a figure from islamic myth. (Why a vedic concept like Akasha would be written in Arabic in the first place is anybody's guess). To be fair I think it is sometimes romanized as Akasha (like with the Nebi Akasha Mosque in Jerusalem). Not sure if this problem lies with the TL or the original though.