I didn't much like this, can't really place why but I just didn't. On another note, and it might just be me, but do their heads look too large for their bodies to anyone else?

I think part of it is the fact that they're like shrunk-down adults rather than kids. The artist had a vague idea that children have bigger heads, proportionally, but that's apparently as far as they got.

Even though the tag said toys, the appearance of the double ended dildo still managed to surprise me. And the large sunny grin that accompanied it was...odd. There were some very well executed parts, and if the artist had not decided to draw thirteen year olds, and had gone for high schoolers, this would have worked better. Only because the artist is struggling to draw thirteen year olds, by making them too young and too old at the same time. That may be a it harsh, as how else do people learn, except by doing.

Where is the yuri in this
:(

Where is the yuri in this
:(

Yeah that stupid "this is just for the time being, until we find husbands" stuff really pissed me off...:/

since when did they break their hymen?

The art literally scared me for the first half their smiles are just so unnerving along with the failed proportions of thirteen year olds ;^; I have no idea why I kept reading but I did and the ending totally pissed me off as well LET'S BE LESBIANS UNTIL WE CAN FIND A DICK D:< HOW ABOUT NO! lol

but whatever what can you do it's what the author wanted to make XD

Where is the yuri in this
:(

Yeah that stupid "this is just for the time being, until we find husbands" stuff really pissed me off...:/

Me too. Wonder if that's how the original dialog goes or merely translation mistakes.
BTW, I don't see a "loli" either.

Agree.
For a yurilover like me it was totally what the fuck am I reading story =/

Me too. Wonder if that's how the original dialog goes or merely translation mistakes.

This is essentially how the dialogue went in the original. While it can definitely come off as offensive, they are 13, and I know more than one person who was "playing around" at that age only to later realize they really did have those tendencies.

BTW, I don't see a "loli" either.

I quite literally know nothing about lolicon or how it is defined. It's tagged as such on Ex-hentai, and it was requested as a tag change within about 5 minutes of it being uploaded. Seeing as how underage (especially pre/early-pubescent) porn is often frowned upon, I do think it serves as a decent warning for anyone looking to avoid that.

In most cases, the best way to get possible tag problems noticed is to suggest a tag change - the button is in the top right, near the discussion and download options.

It's generally reserved for visual appearance rather than actual age.
If it's borderline-ish from being clearly underage to sorta underage (loljapan) but there's clear focus on lack of "features" or questionable age then it'll deserve the tag as well.

Edit: Just finished reading it and it's... not as lolicon as a hentai enthusiast would expect. They're clearly underage, but not "loli".

last edited at Jun 2, 2013 11:51PM

Gotcha. Nice to have some sort of clarification on that.

after they have sex, they start talking about her sister having sex with her husband & her mom having sex with her dad, im assuming, which pretty much erased all the yuri sex scene ive just read & made me subconsciously imagine about her sister & mom having sex with their husband. =_= who thinks about their parents or siblings having sex after having sex ,what a wonderful oneshot :/

Pretty much the ultimate in Class S right there. Even having sex on a regular basis isn't enough to turn them Actually Gay, and they'll go get husbands and be Normal Girls (tm) when they grow out of that phase.