This aggressive teasing Yoshiko is very nice

Too young! Middle school! Boooo! I’m putting in a request for “lolicon” tag! I’d have steered clear of this if it was properly tagged.

This is hentai crap dressed up as yuri. I mean: the first part/chapter had no permission towards intimate contact and it’s practically “Rape/defloration”. This isn’t a manga worthy of publication across the pond.

last edited at Mar 12, 2019 12:54AM

^Imagine being this mad about porn

Its love live ofc the girls are underage but a loli tag? I don’t think you know what a loli is.

I don’t really want to know. I figure if it portrays underage participant(s) in sexual activity, it qualifies for the loli tag. And what I mean by underage is U.S. standards (<18). Japan’s more relaxed in that regard and this does make a bit of friction between readers across the pond.

If I see a loli tag, I avoid it. If a manga isn’t properly labeled out of lethargy or intent to get more views, that’s where I get perturbed about it and will squawk over it.

Edit: I didn’t know Love Live features this sort of stuff, I don’t have as thorough an understanding of series as you do... I’ll avoid this series from here on.

last edited at Mar 12, 2019 4:11AM

There's no loli though
That tag literally wouldn't make sense here

last edited at Mar 12, 2019 4:10AM

loli's are girls that are grade school age. So anything middle school or above does not constitute as a loli. I'm saying love live has girls in high school so yes they are underage most of the time but they're not loli's. Also not everything tagged as loli is porn.

last edited at Mar 12, 2019 1:47PM

It must be just before the start of Love Live! Sunshine, so Yoshiko is newly 15 and Riko is 16. We know how Chika met Riko before the year started, but it'd be interesting to figure out how Riko would get involved with Yoshiko.

On Edit: this is clearly a fantasy AU, so Yoshiko is 13 or 14 to Riko's 16.

last edited at Mar 12, 2019 6:11PM

kickap00 posted:

loli's are girls that are grade school age. So anything middle school or above does not constitute as a loli. I'm saying love live has girls in high school so yes they are underage most of the time but they're not loli's. Also not everything tagged as loli is porn.

ah, the classic "no, you mean ephebophilia" argument

kickap00 posted:

loli's are girls that are grade school age. So anything middle school or above does not constitute as a loli. I'm saying love live has girls in high school so yes they are underage most of the time but they're not loli's. Also not everything tagged as loli is porn.

ah, the classic "no, you mean ephebophilia" argument

If you want to go by definition sure. But im not the one upset over imaginary underage girls having sex.

w

Tbh yoshiko's black and red sailor scout uniform just made me shout SENKETSU the entire time

I want more of Yoshiko being dominant of this pairing. It's just too good on the fallen angel.

Too young! Middle school! Boooo! I’m putting in a request for “lolicon” tag! I’d have steered clear of this if it was properly tagged.

This is hentai crap dressed up as yuri. I mean: the first part/chapter had no permission towards intimate contact and it’s practically “Rape/defloration”. This isn’t a manga worthy of publication across the pond.

The fact that this person went to a love live comic and decided to say "boo this is lolicon"

That was two years ago...

Hawt but its september so gg for me