BugDevil posted:
BugDevil posted:
What? I never claimed that I had any studies on emotional abuse ready to throw at his face.
Except we weren't talking about emotional abuse but your statement about promiscuity being inherently bad for your health.
No. That has nothing to do with the thing you quoted. That is off-topic.
We were talking about Miyuki.
"It's funny coming from you after you stated something as fact, without giving evidence to support it."
That something was: "Sleeping around always ends badly. Always. It's just a statistical inevitability."
Which you then constantly argued as true.
And here: "The fact you specifically replied to random asking about it, to just say you're not going to since you're done" I was referring to this:
BugDevil posted:
EDIT: Jeez. I am done with the slut topic now. You two are insufferable.
So I'm guessing I'll never be seeing any kind of citation to back up that blatantly spurious statistical claim you pulled out of your ass then.
LIker I said, I'm done with this topic. This isn't the right thread for it. The Miyuki thing however I can talk about.
You could easily say you have no studies on it. I wonder why you didn't.
(and it's not just about health, stop adding modifiers)
I didn't think there was any difference between "for you" and "for your health", I just thought it sounded better, but since you insist, it actually makes it easier for me.
It was hyperbole. Statistically speaking the more random people you sleep with the higher the probability is. It's simple math.
Anything can end up badly for you the more you do it. The more you do it the more there is chance for something to go wrong. It's true for everything. But it ignores every other possible factor. In other words, this statement is utterly meaningless unless you can back it up with something. And you can't, hence it's just your opinion. Also just because you can calculate probability for something, it doesn't mean it will happen. It's more likely to happen, but that's about it.
Also you complain I added word health? Be happy I ignored you saying that "it's nothing to be proud of", "It's just an unhinged way of life", "These things (junkfood enthusiasm and emo cutters) are related in so far that they have averse consequences on your life" and the cherry on the top "the consequences of that lifestyle exist right now and that's a fact". I'm sure all of those are "statistical inevitabilites" as well and not just your opinions you try to push as facts.
I won't go out of my way to get you studies on this crap after all the nonsense that was thrown at me already.
You brought it on yourself in the first place.
Why exactly are you tryng so hard to restart this convo? I won't be responding to any more of it in this thread and that's final.
I'm allergic to hypocrisy.
last edited at Oct 3, 2019 8:34PM