I’d begrudgingly call this “interesting” but I come away with the impression that the convolutions of the narration are all dressing up a whole lot of nothing actually in particular being said.
Maybe there IS a solution in there? It feels easy to try and exonerate Seki as unreliable and guilt-ridden distorting her own narrative (especially considering the authors art of the ship that Doesn’t seem like an abusive mess? not that they necessarily share continuity, merely an artist making that sorta tonal 180 is inconvenient to my personal sense of taste lol) but on the other side of things that feels TOO clean and also still leaves out a bunch of loose ends (Kag’s role in this, whatever Eirin herself is doing, where the hell the idea of ‘selling’ her came from, etc) that while perhaps easy it seems insufficient as a catch-all Vortex Ending Explained theory. And then if we accept shes somewhat at fault for parts of it but other parts are fabricated or taking unjust responsibility, Which, etc. This feels like a thematic hole where interesting interpretations can be put in but not really taken out again. Best case scenario (compassionately not writerly) is Waka had an accident and the only cure is for Seki to take Pill Which Induce Vivid Hallucinations Of Living In The Worst Possible Whump Timeline You Can.
Also something something angst/violence/abuse of my comfort ot3 how scandalous le gasp they’d NEVER do that etc etc <- that IS my actual initial reaction which I’m looking past for the sake of not being a complete rube. But to be frank it probably is coloring my more intellectualized takeaways from this XP.
last edited at Apr 25, 2026 6:41PM