Bridget being trans caused a big fuss back when it happened, in part due to how poorly managed and executed the retcon was, but even before word of god silenced the transphobes I feel like I saw the majority of the internet enthusiastically embrace the change. I saw a little discussion about the unfortunate choice to take away one of the premier internet femboys, already in short supply, but other nuanced discussion about Bridget's established forcefem backstory/character giving the retcon (at best) kind of questionable optics was very limited and brief.
Admittedly, I'm coming at this from entirely outside the series, but to me trans Bridget seems like an overall weaker, less interesting version of the character. I'm genuinely curious why the broad reception was and is so positive, but I wouldn't have brought it up at all this long after the fact if I hadn't thought of something... We have yet to even learn the name of Bridget's twin. Why didn't they take the opportunity to introduce them and have them be trans instead? It would have avoided retconning a beloved character and, in my opinion, made for a much funnier and less problematic story of both children breaking free of their weird, prejudiced parents.
Edit: I refer to "retcon" specifically based on the aforementioned word of god, not in denial of it. If you'll forgive my paraphrasing, the idea of Bridget being trans was said to be part of the original story planned for them, but the writers felt they couldn't tell the story at the time. Implicitly, that means they had been telling a different story until Strive. Remember that fictional characters do not exist outside of their media, and therefore unlike a real trans person, it is possible for a character to "become" transgender.
last edited at Apr 20, 2026 10:42PM