Might be a bit late to join this discussion, but anyway
I think the one thing about this manga bugged me the most is that how it depicted cheating. Cheating and two-timing appeared way too romantic and cutesy, even with a little to no amount of guilt Youko had it was brushed off so easily under the name of "love". The second thing is that the "supposedly to be" drama trio lacks too much depth in their character, especially Boyfriend-kun. He exists only for a sole reason to make Youko to feel guilty, and, even then he wasn't that strong of a reason to make her feel bad. He has no traits, no personality, no feeling of his own. Such a boring existence. It bothers me so much that what could be a good triangle love that portrays teenager's ugly side, selfishness and complex, conflicting thoughts and emotions was executed so badly due to writing choice. It's not about how a manga MUST be about goody two shoes human being, it's about how flat the story and its character went with this manga. Heck, most characters from Kuzu no Honkai are way more terrible in their personalities than Youko, yet I still enjoyed Kuzu no Honkai a lot. Because its characters feel "alive", they are jerks but they still have struggles, they still have their own lives and their emotions to deal with. Sadly it's not the case with Motto Hanjuku Joshi. Every single character feel so flat, drama happened because the plot said so.
To be fair Motto Hanjuku Joshi isn't bad, objectively. I'd put it around average in quality compared to romance manga in general. It's just that Hanjuku Joshi was so damn good and Morishima Akiko is one of the better mangaka in yuri sphere, therefore, I had higher expectation, ended up feeling dissatisfied and disappointed.
last edited at Dec 20, 2024 10:39AM