Stupid question, does anyone know if the BNA book on the 'next projects' page is sold anywhere still? it's such a generic title i can't find anything about it

https://booth.pm/en/items/2489206

WSDHANS ( https://dynasty-scans.com/scanlators/we_still_dont_have_a_name_scanlations ) is currently down two typesetters and we urgently need an experienced one.
Contacts:
Discord: anya#9356
Email: alpacatoki@gmail.com

Thank you.

Oh, PDP is starting. Anyone know if they're getting manga or anime?

They have a 4koma, which has been translated here https://ganbaramen.tumblr.com/tagged/perfect-dream-project .

Also, the washi washi and "sexual harassment" in general is canon https://78.media.tumblr.com/ccee5fc7fdcdf90604aff2aa0bc3bd71/tumblr_owewijhGad1wq7vl2o3_1280.png

last edited at Aug 25, 2018 6:21AM

I'm thinking about working as Typesetter. Does anyone need?

We do. How can I contact you?

While negom will probably never outright say it's Rikka, there are a lot of hints to it (the design, being a doctor and the diamond shaped necklace). And to be fair, she isn't wrong in calling her a mob character given that in the Hugtto universe, an older Rikka would be just that.

The email.. just how many "i" does it have the akariiin? It wasn't a good idea making it so small lmao

It's akariiiiiiiiin@gmail.com (9)

https://dynasty-scans.com/chapters/summer_vacation_1#41

When it says "she came" does it mean that You came for advise or that Kanan had an orgasm lmao

The japanese text was for "that You came for advise" but the ambiguity in english makes it better.

This being tagged as "futanari" is dumb and you should remove it (read Goggled Anon's posts for the reason).

Anyone knows if there are more yuri one shots by this artist?

wtf was the editor thinking?

The translation is also very inaccurate, as it has huge rewrites of the original.
One example is a thought bubble where You says that "she's acting like an old man" in the original whereas in the translation she says "My favorite picture".
http://puu.sh/xq4Da/7f93a4c03e.png vs http://puu.sh/xq4DD/9e1a0fb357.png

last edited at Sep 2, 2017 7:39PM

What is really sad about this chapter is that, unlike in the original School Idol Days, we won't get a chapter with the alternative ending where both You and Riko become Chika's girlfriends and live happily ever after.

nyanya posted:

Lain posted:

Also, a faceless woman paying for sex with an anime character, wtf?

Because faceless woman can't have sex with anime character in doujin. We need to gather and protect the rights of faceless women!

We get it, you like faceless trash and think it's "good" just because of that.
It doesn't change the fact that this doujin is garbage as a derivative work and what you like will never be part of the source material.

1. I don't like faceless trash
2. I don't think faceless trash is inherently better.
3. Nobody argues or wants it to be part of canon. The definition of doujins is making shit up based on the source material.

We should change this thread name to "Assumptions" since it seems what everyone is doing.

Seeing someone defending something so obviously bad with jokes instead of an actual argument kinda leads to that, yeah...

"The definition of doujins is making shit up based on the source material."
No it isn't. Doujinshi means roughly "Self published Comic" and it can be anything from original works to derivative works.
As a derivative work, any person that knows the source material can judge it's quality as such. Any sane, non-biased and not deluded fan of the series will tell you that this work doesn't represent the source material at all.
But if you still think it does, you only need to prove where in the source material you can find the basis for this work (setting and characters, namely this faceless "character" you don't even know the name of).
Of course if this was an original work I wouldn't be having this conversation with you or anyone else...

last edited at Apr 20, 2017 8:21AM

Lain posted:

Also, a faceless woman paying for sex with an anime character, wtf?

Because faceless woman can't have sex with anime character in doujin. We need to gather and protect the rights of faceless women!

We get it, you like faceless trash and think it's "good" just because of that.
It doesn't change the fact that this doujin is garbage as a derivative work and what you like will never be part of the source material.
But I doubt you care, you're probably not even a fan of it and think it's ok to insult things you don't care about.

Oh sorry, i was more surprise a doujin when a female character from a serie had sex with a faceless woman.
We need a tag like ''sex with original character'' for the rares cases

100% Agreed, Dynasty may be ok with faceless shit but at least tag it so that people don't get forced to see it.

last edited at Apr 20, 2017 7:53AM

"Funny how you talk about disagreeing, but try your absolute hardest to pass your opinion that some fanart is insulting a fictional character/series as a fact."

I didn't want to post anymore, but you give me no choice.

If only there was a single thing in my reasoning that wasn't based on facts and also not perfectly valid...

I wish "Random faceless girl isn't an LLS character" wasn't a fact... but it is.
I wish "LLS character is depicted as having sex with an original character" wasn't a fact... but it is.
I wish "The artist could have actually drawn something actually related to LLS but chose not to" wasn't a fact... but it is.

Put all these together and you have the perfect example of a derivative work that due to the artist's incompetence completely fails at being what it should have been... a derivative work.
You see, when you can't even respect something as fundamental to an original work as it's finite set of characters is, you've failed from the get-go.

Any original work can be seen as a finite set of attributes, like it's characters, locations, etc...
For characters in original work A, it would be something as simple as:

A = { "Characters of A" = { a, b, c, d }, "Locations of A", ... }

Now consider a derivative work of A, let's call it A'. A' would look like this:

A' = { "Characters of A' " = { a, b, c, d, e' }, "Locations of A", ... }

Now what everyone is trying to convince me of and trying to make it an opinion rather than a fact is that A = A' which is FALSE. It will never be true, no matter what you or I think. You have to be completely deluded to think the content of A is the same as A', they are objectively not the same. There is no reason to include "e' " or any number of other elements that don't belong to A in your derivative work and break any connection to the source material unless you're either incompetent, stupid or have ulterior motives.

If you read all this and still think this is all just an opinion and not actually purely logical, you're hopeless.
It's the reason why some artists never draw such content and also why it's not accepted at series' events. Things that don't belong just don't belong, period. It's a fact, not an opinion.

last edited at Apr 14, 2017 2:15PM

Wow nyanya. You said you will shut up and then create new account to keep complaining? Or you fucked up or logged in into wrong account by mistake? Or you don't care anymore at this point? Either way, I don't have to know if you are smart or not, you just proved to me yourself you are a moron.

EDIT/ And the moron's post were purged. How to not love this guy.

That had nothing to do with me, good job making yourself look like an idiot.
And what's up with the weird animosity towards me, are you like this with anyone that you disagree with?

I just made a valid and objective criticism about this work's nature. I'm not responsible for people not accepting facts (character sleeps with random person, random person isn't an LLS character), being strangely defensive about it or attacking my person without actually debunking it.

I'll shut up now.

I thought I had started a firestorm in this thread before going to sleep, and thought it was bad enough and couldn't get really much worse after Nez's note. Oh boy, was I wrong. I didn't expect we'd get crack-kun to start another meteor storm over. Sorry, this just went from polemic to silly in one post.

I'm not crack-kun. This also has nothing to do with crack so the comparison doesn't even make sense.
And like I said before, the WHO doesn't matter in an argument, stop with the ad hominem. If you can't counterargue, just shut up and don't post.

last edited at Apr 14, 2017 10:24AM

Homosexual and Heterosexual people aren't inherently good/bad because of their sexual orientation.

Weeeeeell, I don't think so, really. I'm not going to explain my views, because it's useless flood, but I don't have any double standarts. Or you just don't understand the meaning of this expression.

"I judge people based solely on their sexual orientation."
"I can judge situations fairly without looking at each part's sexual orientation."

This is very hard to believe, but I'll believe it anyway because there is no point in denying it. When I mention double standards, I obviously mean the people that think "...B-But it's fine if it's yuri!" and not every single person in the community.

Minutoh don't argue with him, it is our dynasty Troll-kun next alternative account. There is no reasoning with this guy.

You're wrong. Even IF you were right, that's ad hominem. Please stop.

But remember, you and everyone else, that all I'm saying is that "Character A is being depicted doing things that were never implied in the original and those things are of a morally questionable nature"

This has nothing to do with slut shaming, it's about portraying a character and a series as something that they aren't. It's also about quality standards (dynasty's).
Don't bring morality to this discussion please.

Yeah...def not trolling...

Again, please stop trying to make this about slut shaming. I never stated my position regarding it and it's not even the core of my argument. You can't deny that it is morally questionable (and by this I mean to some people, not necessarily me or you) and completely unrelated to the character in question.

Also stop baselessly accusing me of trolling, if you can't counterargue properly at least don't shitpost.

Look, the thing is you are going on a rant about how this work in particular portrays You doing things that she wouldn't do in the somewhat accepted Canon of Love Live Sunshine, and that, because of that, it's disgusting and offensive and whatnot.

See, that's the beauty of fanwork: it doesn't have to BE whatever the source material wanted it to be. You are supposed to judge fanwork for it's own merits, not because of how accurate it is to it's source material.

What I'm saying here is that you have this attitude of "this is bad and you should FEEL bad" about the way You is portrayed on this comic, and you are entitled to your opinion, of course. But it's only that: your opinion. Don't pretend to go on a crusade to tell Dynasty forums what is and what is not appropriate to post, just based on your opinions. No, wait, I'm sorry. Your "facts"

And "My "facts"" huh... Because it's not you who is delusional and seeing things that don't exist at all...
OK, then I want you to tell me where in the source material you can find the following:

• Hints that You sleeps with random people
• The name of the faceless girl depicted in this work
• In what episodes does this faceless girl show up
• What kind of relationship this faceless girl has with any of the cast

If what I'm saying is just my opinion and not facts, I'm sure you can do it.
...
Of course any rational, non-delusional fan of the series can't find these... ever. This work is worthless as far as a derivative work of LLS. It's that simple. The artist could write the same story but instead of shoehorning their worthless original character that only exists in his mind he could just use one existing character. That's what most yuri artists do, not because of preference but respect for the source material and artistic integrity.

last edited at Apr 14, 2017 10:20AM

Homosexual and Heterosexual people aren't inherently good/bad because of their sexual orientation.

Weeeeeell, I don't think so, really. I'm not going to explain my views, because it's useless flood, but I don't have any double standarts. Or you just don't understand the meaning of this expression.

"I judge people based solely on their sexual orientation."
"I can judge situations fairly without looking at each part's sexual orientation."

This is very hard to believe, but I'll believe it anyway because there is no point in denying it. When I mention double standards, I obviously mean the people that think "...B-But it's fine if it's yuri!" and not every single person in the community.

Minutoh don't argue with him, it is our dynasty Troll-kun next alternative account. There is no reasoning with this guy.

You're wrong. Even IF you were right, that's ad hominem. Please stop.

But remember, you and everyone else, that all I'm saying is that "Character A is being depicted doing things that were never implied in the original and those things are of a morally questionable nature"

This has nothing to do with slut shaming, it's about portraying a character and a series as something that they aren't. It's also about quality standards (dynasty's).
Don't bring morality to this discussion please.

Yeah...def not trolling...

Again, please stop trying to make this about slut shaming. I never stated my position regarding it and it's not even the core of my argument. You can't deny that it is morally questionable (and by this I mean to some people, not necessarily me or you) and completely unrelated to the character in question.

Also stop baselessly accusing me of trolling, if you can't counterargue properly at least don't shitpost.

double standard of "hetero is bad on principle, everything that is yuri is good"

What do you mean double? Hetero is bad, I hate it. I don't have hetero friends, I don't talk to my relatives, I only have social relationships with lesbians and I feel great about it. Well, some guys and girls out there are hetero, I might ask for a tissue from them and would give one if being asked, nothing more. What's so double standart about my hate to hetero?

Although I do agree with you - this doujin is piece of shit. Well drawn, but disgusting.

"Hetero work A" and "Yuri work B "having the exact same content aside from character's genders. "Work A" is seen as bad/unacceptable while "work B" is seen as good/acceptable SOLELY based on one being hetero and the other being yuri.
Since you've deemed everything that is hetero bad, you're like the embodiment of this double standard lmao.
Homosexual and Heterosexual people aren't inherently good/bad because of their sexual orientation.

last edited at Apr 14, 2017 5:10AM

I guess it's time to bring all the doujins with faceless males raping girls from yuri series to Dynasty then.
Because the concept of quality of derivative works doesn't actually exist right?

What you describe isn't yuri, this one is. Dynasty is yuri centered so faceless men doujins won't be uploaded here. Not because they're bad or anything, but because they're not what this site is about. I don't think anyone should be in a position to mandate what porn or lewd stories or whatever people like reading.

If you find the quality not to your tastes you should just ignore it. Others might like it. As such, you not liking it is no grounds for having it deleted from the site.

How about we started minding our own business for a change. Would solve many problems.

Here comes the delusional libertarian...

• "I don't think anyone should be in a position to mandate what porn or lewd stories or whatever people like reading. " Except that is exactly what is going on in this site... the staff decides what it considers to be good/acceptable and what isn't on a daily basis. Did you also know that original non-character garbage is not well seen at official series events? Fans don't want to go to an event and see their series shitted on.

-"What you describe isn't yuri, this one is."
Funny, I don't see the yuri tag.

-"If you find the quality not to your tastes you should just ignore it. Others might like it. As such, you not liking it is no grounds for having it deleted from the site."
This isn't about what me or you like or don't like, nor is it about deleting anything. It's about how inconsistent the community (dynasty's and in general) are when it comes to quality. And by this, I obviously mean the recurring double standard of "hetero is bad on principle, everything that is yuri is good".

Minutoh don't argue with him, it is our dynasty Troll-kun next alternative account. There is no reasoning with this guy.

You're wrong. Even IF you were right, that's ad hominem. Please stop.

@Minutoh
"1 - none of the characters are sexualized at all." and "2 - Well, it actually has a story with a well-defined conflict and some fairly philosophical things (of course, that's subjective)."
I agree, those points are the saving grace of this work.

But remember, you and everyone else, that all I'm saying is that "Character A is being depicted doing things that were never implied in the original and those things are of a morally questionable nature" and "The work in question also uses an original character that is in no way related to the source material". These are facts and don't change regardless of what you think.

I guess it's time to bring all the doujins with faceless males raping girls from yuri series to Dynasty then.
Because the concept of quality of derivative works doesn't actually exist right?

Good yuri. I'm a sucker for disaffected girls pursuing age gap.

Nice double standards. If you think faceless generic female is good, then by the same logic a faceless generic male is also good, unless of course you have some weird bias going on, like the "females are more pure" bullshit...

I appreciate that you're applying your healthy and not weird slut-shaming bias towards any fan work, regardless of the genders of the sluts in question. Look forward to seeing you bring the hammer down on all dynasty's promiscuous girls, and presumably not just the transgender ones.

This has nothing to do with slut shaming, it's about portraying a character and a series as something that they aren't. It's also about quality standards (dynasty's).
Don't bring morality to this discussion please.

nyanya posted:

unless of course you have some weird bias going on, like the "females are more pure" bullshit...

Nah. It is simple yuri makes everything better.

This isn't even yuri... But even if it was, I'd love to hear you explain that in a rational and consistent way.

I mean exactly what I said, that this work is disrespectful to the series and character in question.

Yeah, love, I'm sure all those poor fictional characters are deeply offended by how they're being portraited in fanmedia.

What does this have to do with fictional characters being offended?
It's a fact that you're insulting something and that's precisely what I'm saying. Seems like you're admitting to being ok with it and in that case, I don't need to speak with you anymore since I'm actually not judging. Just remember that facts don't change just because of what you think.