I expected more from you Nevri.
I would advise against continuing on in this manner when the other person in the discussion is clearly not interested in continuing. I would doubly advise against falling towards taunts. Intentional or not, this line is simply unnecessary.
Well I was not taunting. I'm genuinly disappointed that Nevri who usually makes very sound arguments would use that kind of non-sequitur. I quite literally expected a more reasonable reply.
I suppose it could be interpreted as a taunt saying that Nevri should be a bigger challenge.. or something? Sorry I can barely even see it as that. Text often does not convey intent.
EDIT: Also I was called "out of touch" with absolutely no back up for the claim... does that not count as taunting too then?
I'm genuinely disappointed in you BugDevil not to mention our failing education system.
See, how that works?
Also their argument was far from a non-sequitur. Their point is when it comes to cartoon fetishes where there is obviously nobody being harmed by the creation of the fetish content there is no difference between banning something like yuri and banning something like necrophilia, bestiality, incest, pedophilia etc. in that the banning has no moral grounds and is instead based upon one's own personal sense of disgust which has no place in policy making.
Just because the majority of people find something revolting doesn't mean they get to thought police those that do not. That in itself is immoral.
last edited at Jul 29, 2019 5:52PM