WOAH for this firstly.

And when does this apply? Drawing a literal animal to refer a person or attaching some animal parts (ears, tail, etc.)?

last edited at Feb 17, 2014 12:28AM

The tag was only made today, whilst sifting through some of Daigaga and other's work.

As we already have an Animal ears tag, and something like a tail is relatively uncommon, this will only be used - for now, at least - for literal animal depictions of non-animals. I'll whip up a little bit of a description for it tomorrow...

last edited at Feb 17, 2014 12:45AM

The tag was only made today, whilst sifting through some of Daigaga and other's work.

As we already have an Animal ears tag, and something like a tail is relatively uncommon, this will only be used - for now, at least - for literal animal depictions of non-animals. I'll whip up a little bit of a description for it tomorrow...

Ah, I mean, I'm just feeling it funny that I had just used the "-ization" spelling here less-than-five-days ago and found it showed up for real today.

It would be fair to say that your comments there were the inspiration for the creation of the tag.

shouldnt this be humanization instead?