really good, the only unrealistic thing is that none of them are on testosterone or something cuz damn, i wish building that much muscle was that easy just by eating a lot of protein
It clearly shows that working to get those muscles took a LOT of effort. You don't need steroids.
Can confirm. Former bodybuilder here.
FWIW, back when I actually went regularly to the gym (because I wished to get enough strength to surprise princess-carry my then-fiancee the big day - I double dog-dare you all to find a better reason for doing strength building) I was able to put on 20 Kg of muscle mass in six months. And the bigorexic crowd gave me the stink eye because they were convinced that the skinny one who turned not-so-skinny was, no doubt, using better steroids than them. The only thing I used was effort. Lots and lots of effort. And regular attendance, not skipping days. I managed to be able to deadlift princess carry 80 Kg just in time, so it was worth it. Of course, once I stopped going to the gym after the wedding, I lost 10 of those Kg of muscle REAL fast. Which underscores the "you need effort" part, doesn't it?
No longer bodybuilding. The only thing I keep from that age and time is the red sequins underwear I bought as "sports equipment" for bedroom amusement value. I mean, if you're gonna bodybuild, you NEED proper equipment - you never know whether you're gonna take part in a private performance stage contest! :-D