This is where just our (meaning 'Muricah) lack of collectivism hinders us. I'll spare the details, but our closest friend is our lover. And if he/she isn't, then there's something broken or lacking in the relationship. I don't buy into Montaigne's theory that there is only one true friend for us though, so I think we can have multiple really close friends.
I don't understand what you're saying here, but I strongly disagree that your romantic partner shouldn't be your best friend. 'Cause in my experience it totally should. I think way too many people try to separate romance from friendship, like romance is this thing where you go buy flowers and go to movies, which to me doesn't seem like a very healthy attitude to sustain a longlasting relationship.
Your partner should also be your best friend IMO because if you're going to have a relationship last through the decades and possibly many hardships ("through sickness and in health...") you're going to need to be spending a lot of time together, and it might not all be peaches and roses.
Heck, in a serious relationship you'll live together (which is exactly as frightening as it sounds.) Sleep togther. See each other every morning and every night. So be damn sure you like the same things and like doing them together, because you are going to be spending more time together with them than anyone else, and like I said its not all going to be red roses and blue violets.
Relationships take comittment, and comittment isn't easy. It means putting that person ahead of everyone else, including yourself. Being there for them when they need you, whether its covenient for you or not. So pick well, and pick carefully, and my advice to anyone reading this is pick the person you're closest to, the person you like the best. 'Cause you're going to have to devote yourself to the.
So, to me at least, I can't envision being closer to a friend than to my girl.
Again though, I might be misunderstanding what you're saying. I really don't understand what you're trying to get at.
But with Madoka, it is INCREDIBLY difficult - so much so it's not even worth contemplating - to keep any of the Holy Sextet in character and ship them outside their respective 'canon' ships (with the exception of pre-Rebellion KyouMami and MadoSaya, which are really cute when I remember they are implied to be canon in earlier timelines)
I agree with this, and I think you misunderstood what I was trying to say. I was using this to point out how extreme his logic was, and that according to the absoluteness of his only-the-cannon counts type statements even pairings like KyoSaya and HomuMado that have tons of logic backing them up can still be considered as equally "degrading" as crack ships according to his flawed logic.
But If you keep the chracters 100% identical to the original series then nothing will happen that didn't happen in the original series, which again defeats the purpose of making a doujin in the first place. All doujins involve at least tweaking the cannon.
Well, I think you're missing the point a little here. Stories are an engagement with the audience, and if we don't fill in the gaps and the before n' afters, then we're failing as an audience. So doujins are just one of many extensions of them, as kind of a part of the Uses and Gratifications theory of media (basically, we go out and make our own media to satisfy our desires...I kind of agree with the idea there, but not the whole thing).
So doujins don't necessarily tweak canon so much as they simply express our take on the story at that given time in a given mindset. Of course we can fudge with the canon a bit, and that's fine, just so long as we don't detract from it
Again, we're basically saying the same things except you said it better here. All doujins require 'filling in the gaps' with ideas, content, and expansions not provided in the cannon. All I was pointing out was you can't have a doujin that doesn't expand on the cannon in some way.
As to the rest, OT[numbers] are just... the worst.
(P.S. Sorry the first part turning into a wall-o-text rant. :/ I don't know what got into me. Maybe this guy's obsesion with writing wall-o-text rants is contageious. :p ...I'll stop commenting now.)