Forum › Posts by Meursault

Meursault
Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016

How sweet ^^

Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016

we would never think of taking another series unless we got the ok from the previous team that was working on it but thank you anyway. I already contacted them but got not response yet.... that\s why I thought of trying my luck here as well

Probably because they're not the ones working on it but yeah, good luck. I'm sure most would want to know if the actual group is even thinking of working on it anymore

Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016

is yuri ism still doing this manga? if not CHAOSTEAM would love to take over in the near future since we have the raws for the first two volumes.

Yuri ism hasn't been the ones doing the series, just the doujins it seems. Maybe check with the team actually involved. Dunno if they really check this thread, so it might be a better start to directly contact them? Rather than to ask about the wrong group in a thread they may not follow, and take a lack of response and reader enthusiasm as sign of permission with them being okay with it. Might avoid some awkwardness to get a clear ok on it, just in case ¯_(ツ)_/¯

last edited at Nov 20, 2017 4:05PM

Meursault
Image Comments 17 Nov 02:54
Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016
Zfoa2ot

That pocky stick kinda lacks chocolate doesn't it

Meursault
Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016

The last page with the worker running off like "NOPE" really made me laugh

Meursault
Citrus discussion 25 Oct 07:38
Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016

Even then, demeaning the guy for him to consider this art to be one of the best is uncalled for. It's by far the most subjective comment they made. For one there's no such thing as "one of the best", people can only mean "one of the best i've seen", how are you to even comment on that not to mention art itself is entirely subjective opinion. Who are you to tell someone that what they perceive as good isn't? People can find accidental paint splatters amazing.

All'n'all that was unwarranted, and this blurb was excessie

Had he opened up his excuse of a response with anything but loose comparisons and less of a butthurt toned offended victimized tantrum, when I clearly stated I wasn't preventing anyone from liking anything but was instead rather curious on the opposite take of my personal opinion/taste, maybe my hostility wouldn't have been called for.

And really, after that explosion of verbal diharrea from them, did you really expect me to take that subjective yet-not-put-very-subjectively statement seriously? I thought it was hilarious, so I made sure to include my giggles on it. I never claimed people can't like things, even if in my book they're bad. Quality discourse and reading comprehension were never the spotlight in Citrus discussions, I guess.

They wrote one or two passive aggressive lines at best
Your condescending hostility however, was overblown and pointlessly aggro, it was far from justified

Meursault
Their Story discussion 25 Oct 03:15
Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016

GIRL! YPUR BUTCH IS SHOWING AND ITS BEAUTIFUL I THANK YOU FOR MAKING THIS.

"Ypur"?

Your*

Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016

Ikr? The term "Gross" is such a nasty word that's used towards people who cut themselves! Such discrimination!

You can choose to be a dick if you want. Honestly, you can. But it doesn't mean you should, or that it's okay. You shouldn't be surprised if others call you out for it.
Don't justify being an asshole with expressing honesty.

Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016

Gross the black haired has cuts all over her wrists

This is probably super insensitive and rude.
Can you imagine, walking up to someone and straight up telling them that their scars (wherever they are) are disgusting? Rather inappropriate, very likely hurtful to whom this may concern.

Ikr? how dare someone express their honest views of being grossed-out by Self-Mutilation!

You seem to not realise that this is just straight up insensitive and insulting.
Would you really walk up to someone, anyone, stranger or friend, and tell them that their scars are gross?
No. Because you might have common sense and might be able to imagine how it could make them feel.
Even if you unfortunately had those views, you might realise that these "honest views" may not be pleasant to share.
I'm not encouraging self harm, but honestly, for whatever reason they had, they likely weren't, or aren't in a good place. They don't need or have to tolerate your insensitive judgemental bullshit just because you decided you wanted to be honestly an asshole.

Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016

Gross the black haired has cuts all over her wrists

This is probably super insensitive and rude.
Can you imagine, walking up to someone and straight up telling them that their scars (wherever they are) are disgusting? Rather inappropriate, very likely hurtful to whom this may concern.

Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016

"Do you intent to become a god?"

Same
Head's up

last edited at Oct 2, 2017 2:42AM

Meursault
Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016

Was this dropped? It was coming out pretty regularly until right before the last chapter (a week without swapping).

If I recall correctly, Doki usually waits for the tankoubons (is that what they're called?) so that they can translate the version of the manga with the highest quality... and the volumes of this manga take a loooong time to come out. I think that's why there was a one-year gap between Volume 1 and Volume 2. Of course, I'm probably wrong, so feel free to correct me if I'm off base.

Yeah I remember something like that too, but volume 2 still has one chapter left (check the table of contents)

Meursault
Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016

I'm confused by the point of your comment, is there a joke I'm missing?

Hot damn there, FluffyCow
Yes, yes there is
Might have taken that just a bit more seriously than you should have

last edited at Sep 27, 2017 3:28AM

Meursault
Ayakashiko discussion 21 Jul 19:47
Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016

Gosh I just can't stop squealing!!! Everyone in this manga is just so cute and yuri and everyone should cuddle and kiss already!!!

...
Fight me, boy-o

If your only reply to everyone going to be:
"...
Fight me, boy-o"?

Fight me, boy-o

Meursault
Image Comments 08 Jul 05:55
Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016
Gay_shit-1

From what I understand, it's more that they've started using that tag/taken and involved 'yuri' to actually refer to something yaoi, and it's like, bruh, don't take our word, use your own, rather than ppl believing it's about two male bottoms

Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016

It put in some extra amounts of subtext to get some extra fans.

Subtext isn't anything new.
Besides, I don't see why it being heavy on the subtext invalidates every other single aspect of the series

last edited at Jun 4, 2017 8:46PM

Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016

A lot of people conflate their subjective feelings on a subject with objective qualities of that subject.

Disliking something doesn't automatically mean that thing is bad.

Myeah, I think that sucks :/
Not being interested in something cus it doesn't match your interests, sure. I just don't find it legit to decide on something's worth based on what genres you were looking for.
Like giving a sea food restaurant a bad review cus you actually wanted steak and walked in the wrong place. This wasn't steak, so it's shit.

Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016

The series is obviously more than just its ships. If that's all you see and let yourself be disappointed by, then isn't it really your expectations that let you down? Let's just ignore absolutely everything else about the series and focus on how it isn't yuri?
If I started watching cgdct expecting mainstream harem but am disappointed that there's no male self insert, then that show must be shite, right?
Like when people tried watched Soul Eater NOT or Hidan no Aria AA, expecting the spin offs to be like the original series and were disappointed by how it heavily focused on girls and their relationships. Ah man, I thought this cgdct spin off was shonen het, it wasn't, what a shitty anime.
It's not yuri, so it's queerbaiting garbage. Hibike Euphonium: Not Yuri. 0/10.

Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016

They are, because it is not yuri.

Yes, right, these two factors entirely correlate, 100% related, of course
Whenever a series gets movies, it's indeed because it's not yuri, no other merits whatsoever

She didn't say they're getting movies because they aren't Yuri, She said their stories are over because it's not Yuri. That should've been pretty easy to understand.

And thankfully that still really makes sense?
It's not yuri, so it's over, sure. There's 2 more movies but nah, their stories are over. I'm glad you find it as easy to understand as I do

last edited at Jun 4, 2017 5:54PM

Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016

They are, because it is not yuri.

Yes, right, these two factors entirely correlate, 100% related, of course
Whenever a series gets movies, it's indeed because it's not yuri, no other merits whatsoever

Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016

That chapter 2 credit page. This is pretty good though. I was a bit confused when she said "the boy or girl part of me", does that mean she's nonbinary? I hope that's the right term.

I thought about it too
I wonder if she's genderfluid/genderqueer

Comments like this just make me shake my head. She's female and is a lesbian. It's all pretty obvious.

What do you mean? What's wrong with possibly being genderqueer? You say that like it's a bad thing

I don't think they're stating its bad at all, your interpretation is surprisingly negative.

Their interpretation of others' speculation wasn't all that cheery either, leaves a rather bad taste in my mouth

Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016

That chapter 2 credit page. This is pretty good though. I was a bit confused when she said "the boy or girl part of me", does that mean she's nonbinary? I hope that's the right term.

I thought about it too
I wonder if she's genderfluid/genderqueer

Comments like this just make me shake my head. She's female and is a lesbian. It's all pretty obvious.

What do you mean? What's wrong with possibly being genderqueer? You say that like it's a bad thing

last edited at May 28, 2017 11:50AM

Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016

That chapter 2 credit page. This is pretty good though. I was a bit confused when she said "the boy or girl part of me", does that mean she's nonbinary? I hope that's the right term.

I thought about it too
I wonder if she's genderfluid/genderqueer

Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016

Side note, why is it that feminism's credibility is always so heavily attacked? When someone speaks up, or tries to speak up, so many people rush to silent them, making fun of them, acting as if they're delusional or somehow claiming threatening shit. Why is advocating for equality made to be synonymous to unfounded hysteria?

last edited at May 24, 2017 12:15PM

Dame%20na%20watachini%20kouishite%20kudasai
joined May 22, 2016

I agree with you, but the problem is majority of those feminist don't bother specifying which feminist ideology they talk about. They just say feminism, because there is only 1 definition of feminism. Equality for women.

Only feminism I ever heard about is everything is sexist and misogynist. Men are lower being and should have no rights and all the power in the world should be given to women. Men are scum and assholes by default and they should do everything every women tells them. They should get ride of their toxic masculinity because it is oppressive to women. And women are oppressed in every single aspect of their life by male patriarchy that day and night work to make life of every women on earth into hell and we need to fight it. Not to mention habit of making up facts or twisting stuff in order to fit their agenda, like saying that women get paid less on average than men which is not true. Also of course ignoring or dismissing any problems or inequalities men have because they are privilege sex. So basically equality for women, means to them more rights even if the stuff is already equal between sexes and they have no problem demanding more and making it unequal for men, because they are women so they deserve it and men had their fun already. At least all of it apply to feminist activist in America that focus on America, because those are the ones I only heard about, probably since they seems to be the loudest.

...?
But you do know that feminism is (mainly?) about equality.
What you're supposedly describing isn't feminism. It's like when someone completely twists around a concept. The problem isn't the concept, but the people doing bullshit in its name. I don't get why you'd put down feminism as a whole because of that.
You seem to disagree with what feminism shouldn't be used as an excuse to justify, but have cultivated this weird prejudiced bias against it to entirely invalidate and mock feminism as a whole, as if inequality between genders doesn't exist, it's all a myth people have made up in their heads, and those protesting and standing up for women are a bunch of greedy selfish liars. There's something very... "blind", in denial and insulting about what you claim it to be.

last edited at May 24, 2017 12:06PM