At this point some o' y'all are just moving goalposts. Like, I get it, you hate Shiho and nothing she can do or say will ever satisfy you unless she straight-up turns into a completely different character. And that's your prerogative.
But don't act like she's still behaving like she did back when she was introduced or pretend her acknowledging her bitchy behavior (which really, in the end, is just what it was, nothing more) and apologizing didn't happen just because you disagree with her existence period.
Because clearly, your "objective literary analysis" is more tinged by personal views than y'all think it is and at this point it really shows.
Once again, for many of us the issue is not "liking or not liking Shiho" as an imaginary person--it's the quality of the writing, and what the author's conception of the character has done to the overall series.
Yeah you keep saying that but I don't really buy it.
OK, if that's how arguments work, then I think you're lying when you say that you think the series is well-written.
I'm not here to start a debate club with you, I'm just saying for all your going on about quality of writing (which is a pretty subjective thing to begin with), I haven't really seen any arguments for that other than "i don't enjoy how she's written, therefore it's bad writing" while there's at least some tangible evidence to the contrary like the manga's continuing serialization.
Which is fine in itself btw, when I say i think Shiho is well-written and good for the series, then that's also just my personal opinion, but then you could just say it like that instead of insisting your opinion is somehow the pinnacle of literary analysis.
last edited at Nov 19, 2023 5:22PM