I do not understand why people think that the one being narrated can do no wrong. I think the author makes it rather clear that Kanon was at fault.
Why does somebody always have to be at fault?
Well, jokes on me and my rhetorics. I didn't mean she was at fault alone - maybe even 'fault' being too strong a word. Let me be a bit more elaborate.
So by fault I really mean here who took more liberty than what's normally acceptable in a society in their relationship. Even if this is even more difficult here since society never handled disability well. And the story (i.e. Saki) did say that normally a broken relationship is the result of mutual mistakes, yet from what we have seen, Kanons statement about herself coincides with what we have seen. She has overshot at some point playing her weakness and now she's overshooting downplaying her weakness.
Realistically, what an adult should say to her in this situation is that we don't treat her special because we take pity on her, but simply because she needs it. Look, are we supposed to let people in a wheelchair crawl up the stairs? It obviously is ridiculous. Although from another point of view, she really isn't disabled, she herself stated her hearing weakness can be compensated by an hearing aid. Me needing glasses doesn't make me disabled in most people's eyes, simply because it is so common and easily circumventable.
So yeah, what I'm getting at is that she is and was a troubled teenager who really didn't know how to handle herself. At some point she became too clingy and high maintenance for her friend, and that makes her 'at fault'. It doesn't mean that for any other person as a friend the outcome would be the same, but you have to know someone else's limits.
I was specifically answering to the post by luinthoron asking when it was said that kanon was using her friend with my original post.
answer: there wasn't.
last edited at May 9, 2022 3:04PM