Okay, so if that is your stance, do you not get to use the definition of lesbian unless you are a lesbian? Do you not get to use the definition of Caucasian unless you are caucasian?
I am a scientific minded person. I do not believe that people have ownership of definitions. If something cannot be objectively defined at all in any kind of consensus, then it is simply not scientifically defined yet, in which case I also don't have to accept any subjective definition, unless out of respect for the person's logic. I was told several times that the definition for transsexuality has been decided on by now though.
My point is, transness is inherently subjective exactly because it's about gender, one of the most subjective and personal concepts there is. As such the only people who have any kind of expertise or authority over its definition are those who actually live it. I don't give a shit what some dusty college prof decided the definition of transness is, it's completely irrelevant to the lived reality of actual trans people.
Related, stop calling ppl "transsexuals", some might be fine with it but most ppl nowadays dislike it and consider it outdated. Just trans (people) is fine.
This is not actually different from what I said. Unless you believe there are dozens of genders and the like, but that is not related to classical transsexuality. Transsexuality is directly linked between gender and sex. The contradiction of the two is the point. If my sex is female and some doctor accidentally checked the male mark on my certificate, I would not be considered trans just because I was misassigned. There has to be a relation between sex and gender for the term to have any useful application.
Nobody likes gatekeepers, if someone tries to tell a trans person they're not actually trans bc of xy they're full of shit. The contradiction between gender and sex/body aka what most ppl would call body dysphoria is not a requirement for being trans. You can be perfectly fine with the way your body looks, even if it isn't what society would usually define as connected to your gender.
We have a name for people who insist on dysphoria as the requirement for transness (or other bioessentialist crap like that), it's "truescum" and they can fuck right off~
Hermaphrodites, or rather futanari in the case of this discussion, have nothing inherently to do with transsexuality. Neither do intersex people. It is an entirely physical classification. True hermaphroditism is simply not recorded in human biological history, so intersex is the only realistic application of course.
Hermaphrodite is not a porn term, though. The term has existed since ancient Greece and the scientific use has also nothing to do with porn. Hermaphroditism in animals has been classified for a long time and is still used today.
I'm not saying the term itself is obsolete, i'm saying that using it to describe human beings is disrespectful, especially to the people it used to be commonly used for, i.e. intersex people.
This is also the last i'll say about this, I already spent more spoons on this than I intended to.
last edited at Jan 26, 2022 4:14PM