Because is giving the plot a convenient out to "wash" her hands and letting her ride off into the sunset with Natori when everything is said and done, is slowly shifting the narrative so the anti-nobility faction are the true bad guys of the story and so, it kind of justifies Lapis crusade. It turns Lapis from a cold, calculating villain into a grieving child lashing out at the world.
I guess is just me but I think the narrative was more compelling when there was not a huge "freudian excuse" to justify Lapis' actions
But Lapis has always had a reason for her current plans. The series hasn't been shy about that, hinting at it from very early on; it's just not fully revealed her reasoning. The story has also always been about Natori's goal to save Lapis from herself. That's its premise. Lapis having a reason for her actions doesn't make her actions excusable, and having multiple bad actors doesn't alter the story or make her plans less harmful.
To me, the answer isn't "Lapis good and Anti-nobility bad," it's potentially "Lapis's actions bad and Anti-nobility also bad." Real-world villains have reasons, but they are still villains. I think we're focused on "justifications" when these are just "explanations," or causes, which all actions have. All she's been is cold and calculating--how will knowing her backstory change what we have seen "in-person"? Now we just might know why she is cold and calculating. IDK, I just don't see what changes here, but maybe we have had different impressions of the series from the start.
last edited at Jul 25, 2025 4:38PM