No, you are presumptuous in believing I lacked awareness of the context of the scene. I have watched this entire anime and read the manga. I am fully aware of what was going on in this scene. If the author wants to make it clear that one of characters isn't gay that's completely fine. That has nothing to do with hating gay people. It's her story and her characters and she is free to do as she pleases with them.
If you have read it then why did you misrepresent it? And she has seen fit to make absolutely sure that this character not only explain that she isn't gay but that she isn't even aware that gay people exist in their world. Love is dependant on gender according to her.
If she had had Teko say something like," Of course the way I feel about Pikari is different from you because I am a girl and girl's romantically liking other girls is gross and wrong" that would be homophobic. Simply implying that she is strait through an innocuous line of dialogue is not.
No, that's not what she did. She didn't explain that she was straight, she explained that love is different depending on a persons gender. She explained that because she is a girl she can't love another girl, not because she was straight. She thought the same for the kid, but because she found out he was actually a boy his love can only now be romantic when before it was super friendship.
From what I can tell, the author probably was likely initially writing intentional lesbian subtext into her story because some of it is pretty on the nose, and for one reason or another she got pressured to stop doing that perhaps either due fan responses or somebody higher up with her publisher decided that lesbian love stories don't fit the publications image and target demographic. Monthly Comic Blade is a shounen magazine so I can see how she might get asked by her editor to either add a male love interest and or put an end to the lesbian subtext. I have never seen anything said or written by Kozue Amano to suggest she hates gay people.
Except when she added a male love interest and made her characters explain that girls can't love girls in order to kill the subtext. And talk about presumptuous trying to pin it on the editor, where you have far less evidence to make the claim. They didn't just wean off the subtext, they went staight for the juguler.
I don't see where some of the people on this forum get this whole, "It's heterosexual, quick burn it with fire" mentality. Seriously, that's the sort of crap you expect to hear from a bunch of intolerant bigots at a KKK rally when somebody spots a gay person or a black guy. It's not the sort of behavior I would expect from a strongly lgbt community full of people who know what it is like to be discriminated against.
It's a website that mainly hosts yuri content and you can't see why they don't want to see a heavy subtext yuri series turn into a het romance between a teenager and a preteen trap? Really?
Edit: I should probably add that your comment itself didn't really warrant my rant. It was more like the straw the broke the camels back in that it was the last in a long string of comments by people flaming content creators over harmless creative decisions they make for their work. Just because a creator sinks your favorite lgbt ship doesn't mean they should be called bigots or homophobes. Mangaka and other famous artists are people with feelings too and should be treated as such. I really liked Pikari x Teko too, but it doesn't make it ok to flame the poor mangaka just because she took her story a different direction.
And I think otherwise. When a mangaka goes out of their way to intentionally kill off the yuri subtext in favor of shotacon trap romance then they need to be called out for their dumb decisions. If they want to shove in their anti-lgbt story line then they need to be flamed for the bigots that they are.
You completely missed my point.