E. Vigée Le Brun posted:
You skipped over Nari's posts, that's fine. Several others chose to respond to Nari. As discussion is presumably one of the goals of having a forum, Nari's posts have "added" plenty.
I don't know if you'll find this useful, but quoting Wikipedia:
Sure. I'll condense your post to only the parts which concern me.
The massive wall of text (MWOT) often appears in disputes and bombards you with so much information and underhanded hostility that it's almost impossible to keep up without replying with one of your own.
I believe the onus of a reply is always on the one replying. While some folks find it very difficult to do so and I sympathise with that to a degree, the act and contents of any given post ultimately lie with the one making it. To the contrary too, I found several of the replies perfectly respectful, constructive and succinct.
underhanded hostility
Thinly-veiled personal attacks
If you're able to point out either of these things happening in Nari's posts, I am here.
Mwots here take bi-poly ways irl, judge them then use them to condemn this story. Not cool.
If you're able to point out specific examples of Nari - or anyone else - using this story or its actors to judge real people for their romantic or sexual orientations, I am here.
Thank you.
last edited at Dec 20, 2021 1:20AM