It's kind of a strange definition because there's lots of things that lead to social exclusion that don't get in anybody's way, most obviously homosexuality. If I had to define "normal" I'd phrase it essentially in a political manner, "the things, traits, and people valued by those with power over society". One of the ways gay people have grown in acceptance in America is by arguing we're a) only a little bit different from straight people, functional to society to most ways, and b) a valuable market demographic. And it sucks I hate my rights being contingent on some cishet in a suit thinking I can make him richer lol.
But Chameleonmon's definition is useful to themselves and their disguises, rather than being a unified theory. They can get the visual appearance right but don't well understand humans and are thus very imperfect at blending in socially. Their survival odds are directly tied to how homogeneous society is and how badly outcasts get cast out, so acting as an agent against normalcy is a survival strategy. Focusing their behaviors on "not getting in the way" makes sense for avoiding detection, and the people most likely to cause them problems are the people who really care about everyone being "normal".
last edited at Oct 7, 2024 4:27AM