Then why are you even following it for? What enjoyment are you getting from it, exactly? Nothing in this novel seems to be your cup of tea.
That's a very good question, actually XD
I do like the artstyle and I've come to be somewhat interested in Claire... But everything else just ends up annoying me, so perhaps it'd really be for the best to drop it.
I don't think it came across as well in the manga as in the LN, but they didn't come up with this plan. They were forced into it by the figure in black, who told Lambert that they'd kill Lene if he didn't go through with it (in the book Lene shows up with two other men that were guarding her/waiting to kill her if Lambert backed out, and they're the ones who have a knife pressed to Claire's neck; I didn't really care for the change, as it makes Lene look less sympathetic), while also promising that if Lambert completed the mission their agents would help the two of them run away to start a new life together where nobody knew about their secret.
It sounds like the scene in the book made a whole lot more sense. But I'm not sure if I understood this correctly: did they agree to the plan at first and then wanted to back out? (and that was when they threatened to kill Lene?) Or do you mean that they were approached with this threat from the very beginning (which doesn't really seem to be the case, at least not in the manga)? Cause if it's the first, then I don't think it makes them all that more sympathetic.
A "bootstrap paradox" is using knowledge from the future to 'invent' something in the past/present such that it has no real origin anymore. And she did make doujins for Revolution so her knowledge of the game/series is pretty high. To be more specific though she used water magic to flush the poison from his system.
Okay, I'm definitely not very knowledgeable about this, but from what I found when I looked up the term, I don't think you could say that this is a bootstrap paradox...? Isn't the bootstrap paradox supposed to refer to an eternal loop caused when, for example, the actions of someone from the future lead to them being send to the past again once they reach that point in time? Which in this case would translate to Rei knowing how to neutralize the poison from her outside knowledge of the game, and her knowing how to do it and performing it now leading to heroine-Rei knowing how to do it later in the game.
In this case Rei doesn't use future knowledge in a way that she invents something that has no origin, because what she's experiencing and the events of the game are basically two separate timelines. The origin remains what it was (heroine-Rei's invention) and this Rei does not play any role in heroine-Rei finding a way to counteract the poison in the game. What I mean to say is, for this to be a bootstrap paradox (at least as I understood the term) Rei and heroine-Rei would need to be one and the same, or Rei's actions now would need to have directly affected heroine-Rei's efforts in finding the cure in the future.
Apart from that though, I can let go of my frustration about this one, cause if it's something as simple as that, she could have used it just by knowing that's what the heroine did.
last edited at Mar 9, 2022 11:48AM