Just noticed the "dubious consent" tag. Nothing dubious about that, pretty sure that was rape. The thought she has on page 32 is kind of fucked up, as she really doesn't mind taking advantage of drunk women and implies she's done it before. Kind of surprised how chill everyone else is about this.
I mean, morally, all "dubious consent" is rape. The purpose of tags though are to indicate what type of story the work is; according to the tag description, the difference is:
What does NOT apply is when a character actually refuses, either physically and/or by emphatically saying "no", but they eventually engage in the act anyway due to further coercion in the scene. That is rape.
Since this does not happen, the chapter meets the site's definition for the Dubious consent tag. It does not meet the moral definition because, again, morally there is no difference between "dubious consent" and rape.
Anyway, overall this was a strong first chapter, the art's great and the writing is fluid and gives us a good sense of the characters' basic personalities. I think how good the manga ends up being will depend on how much complexity the author provides for what are currently pretty straightforward characters. I would especially like to see the prof's darker sides because if she just ends up as a basically good person who gets seduced by the evil grad student, that might be fun but unsatisfying. Looking forward to more!