However, I don't think what was said on Chapter 1, with future Satsuki's commentary ending with "Komachi Komako should have died", meant that Komako is somehow directly involved with all the premonitions, most likely Satsuki at some point in the future will realize that her preventing the deaths causes a chain reaction. The phrase prior to that is proof:
(...) what I did then might have broken the perfectly fitting gears of fate. That small distortional spreads little by little, until it all starts falling out of place.
Why does it only attract more death? The president himself commented that ever since she enrolled the corpses have been showing up a lot, so her not letting fate follow the "natural" course of things is exacerbating the fatalities around her.
I agree about the chain reaction, considering Prez’s comment.
However, I also think that the statement “Komachi Komako should have died” has either little, or everything to do with the effects of the chain reaction.
Let’s assume that there is a chain reaction at school and its principles are as follow:
1/ The more deaths Satsuki prevents, the worse deaths will await.
2/ It does not matter who Satsuki save, the chain reaction starts, then goes on.
Assuming the above 2 principles, if Satsuki wishes that she could prevent such chain reaction, she would wish that she has never saved anyone at school in the first place. Because saving someone, anyone at all, would start the chain reaction.
However, we know 1 fact: Komachi is not the first person Satuski saved. Her nickname “liar satsuki” comes from the fact that she has already told several others that they would die, but they ended up not dying (because she saved them). Her nickname comes from the fact that she already saved other people at school before Komachi.
If she wishes for there to never be such chain reaction, she would instead state “I should have never saved anyone in the first place.” But Satsuki explicitly states “Komachi Komako should have died” instead.
Thus, there are 3 scenarios:
1/ The chain reaction is not started just by saving anyone, but started by saving Komachi. —> I think this is plausible, even though it sounds ridiculous. The biggest proof is Satsuki stating thinking back on it, what I did then might have broken one of the perfectly fitting gears of fate. This statement can be translated as: “Saving Komachi might have caused the gears to go wrong.”
2/ There is a chain reaction, and saving Komachi can be part of it, but the fact that Komachi is alive is what is problematic. The statement “Komachi Komako should have died” refers to something gone wrong, something even worse than the chain reaction. Maybe Komachi will do something terrible in the future? Or she’s already doing something terrible without us knowing? —-> I also think this is likely. The events surrounding Satsuki might push Komachi closer and closer to revealing her insanity. A scenario where mass murder can happen: Komachi going around and killing people because someone of authority ordered her. It can be simple as that.
3/ There is no chain reaction. Prez’s comment might actually can be interpreted in another way: “Satsuki’s appearance at school itself is causing deaths.” —-> I think this is unlikely, considering the context of the convo between vice prez and prez.
last edited at Aug 17, 2022 4:12PM