really makes you think if kayo was a bad person, would mii-chan still like her? mii-chan's love formed for her as a result of her hairstyling, which then extended out to her as a person. would we have achieved this same ending had kayo been a bad person? is art something that should be separated with the artist? because art is so personal, artists cannot be separated from their creations. the meaning of a piece of art to its creator is exactly what makes it art. but the answer to this question isn't as simple as just "yes". Because if we separate the art from the artist, then it also means that the art cannot justify the actions of the person. just because someone invented the iPhone, doesn't mean we can let him get away from being a terrible person. i think this question is just a matter of perspectice, as there is no one singular answer. this is a subjectice issue, not an objective one. in the end, even if kayo was a bad person, perhaps mii-chan's feelings wouldn't change at all.
...
this made me go on an unnecessarily long tangent.
anyway, the story was short but sweet
