I’m saying (and will let other posters speak for themselves henceforth) that they can be both—the two go hand in hand in this case.
So that added a particular flavor to the authorial malfeasance here beyond simply yet one more manga series that looked promising at the start but ultimately crapped out.
Like I said, this manga has interesting themes that made readers resonate with it, and that's why people "stayed with it despite its many technical deficiencies," clinging to a hope that Uta will have a end to her story that will help in their catharsis. HOWEVER, and I can't believe that this is my third time saying it - the story fails to deliver on its implicit promises - a resolution to this unrequited love conflict that the entire premise of this story in the first place. IF the story managed to resolve said conflict, no matter how the author may have done it, the reader will have closure. Todokanu Ito's conclusion is a non-ending, and that is a cardinal sin in storytelling. The flavor of the authorial malfeasance is overwhelmingly dwarfed by sheer technical incompetence - is my whole point, and I'd even go so far as to say that this whole story is invalidated by that joke of an ending. The story does its themes a huge disservice, not the other way around.
I apologize if I sound ticked off, but honestly, I am a little bit at this point.
The problem is, the themes ended up being really trite. I've read a kabillion manga with a high school girl opining "I will lock away the precious blossom of my youthful love without regrets and move forward celebrating the bittersweetness in my heart."
I think there just kinda was never a lot any author could do with Uta. She's in love with Kaoru and has decided not to try to get over it and is pretty much mature about the whole thing. "Unrequited love exists" is... not deep or interesting.
Kaoru (and Reiichi) is in a much more interesting position, wrangling societal and parental expectations, figuring out the difference between different kinds of love, trying to balance your own desires with the needs of others. But Uta is portrayed as the protagonist (at least at first), and anyone empathizing with her is going to just be frustrated with Kaoru. I feel like the big selling point was "a high school girl is in love with her sister-in-law!!!" and with that the author painted themself in a corner.
I don't think the themes are trite at all. To say that is to dismiss the very real feelings a lot of people have to go through in life. That's like saying that exploring the nuances that can be found in the clash between good and evil in a story is trite. It's simply not true. A good author will find a way to write a good story for the themes of their choosing. You can have compelling characters, a unique setting, etc.
"Unrequited love exists" is... not deep or interesting.
That's not all there is to it. The main conflict of this story is "How will Uta ultimately deal with her unrequited love?" and not just "Does unrequited love exist?" That's an absurd thing to say. On the topic of this main conflict, the author decides in the end to NOT answer this question, and instead faff about with things nobody asked for, like Risako and Reiichi's drama, that girl who was in that beach photo in the end, that whole "I wanna have kids" moment with Kaoru, etc. The author wasted a lot of time on actual narrative garbage instead of putting that effort into exploring the themes they brought up in the beginning of the story. A bunch of non sequiturs that all ended up in the garbage bin along with the main plot point, unresolved, until the end of time.
last edited at Oct 25, 2020 5:55AM