Your right, consent keeps getting redefined. As we learn to become more sensitive to the victims of these crimes, we refine our definition of consent to better protect them.
For heaven's sake! The girl was so young and naive, that she didn't even understand, what was being done to her, was sex! If that isn't too immature to give consent, then the concept, of consent, is meaningless!
To be fair, our understanding of murder and due process is pretty good too, yet few people criticize Murcielago and so on for doing away with that. Why is it that we have a tougher time with fictional sex crimes (or at least ethical dubiosity) than with fictional crimes of violence?
I'm fine with arguments like, "It's just a story, so relax.", or "If you don't like it, don't read it.". What disturbs me, is there seems to be people, who are arguing that the older woman did nothing wrong, when she is clearly a pedophile. Again the girl was too young and naive, to understand what was being done to her! If the age of concent laws are not set up to protect victims like that, then what the hell are they for?!
I might read books, or watch movies, where the protagonist, goes on a revenge fueled murder spree, hell, I'll even cheer the person on, as they mow down the vile scum, by the truck load. However, when I put down the book, or walk out of the theater, I know what the protagonist did was wrong. So, whether we liked this story, or not, we should all be able to agree, that the older woman is most assuredly a sex offender.
Edit; For the record I wasn't cheering the older woman on. rereading the comments, I agree with White Rose's point, we are ment to sympathise with girl. Still I wish, the author had made the girl sophisticated enough to give consent.
last edited at Dec 21, 2018 6:41PM