Incestuous bdsm prison porn, to boot. Don't think it's specifically nazi due to the uniforms

I'm suddenly reminded of my disappointment with Sorcerer Hunters.

Wholesome and beautiful. ♥

dammit I loved the sepia filter, it gave the manga a unique warmth

It seems to me that polyamory would be very useful for their society.

"Always two there are.... no more... no less. A mistress and a loli."

boing

Could this be considered soft rape? or rape play?

It could considered good stuff either way.

But when you have a work that, ostensibly, wants itself to be taken seriously, random out of nowhere service scenes are nothing else but a sort of bat signal for otaku to reassure them that "don't worry, this caters to you". It also gives the impression that your work is not good enough to stand on its own without appealing to such crowds.

What a strangely puritanical POV.

By definition, an angel is agender and asexual.

The concept of lusty angels is something only Japan can produce.

Pretty sure Japan didn't write the books of Genesis, Enoch, or Jubilees.

sudden flashback to a classic Peanuts story:

https://13thdimension.com/exclusive-preview-peanuts-28/

"Don't blame me when your ears fall off, sir!"

last edited at Jul 14, 2020 1:47PM

Ahh, if only they knew at this time how far Star Wars would fall from grace...

I was thinking the same thing. We can only imagine what kind of arguments these three got into after Episode IX.

"this is something normal"

https://dynasty-scans.com/chapters/you_are_totally_in_love_with_me_arent_you_ch07#3

I'm also waiting for the almighties one to come make fun of peoples being serious. They're always lurking in the shadows waiting for that.

Being able to separate fantasy from reality is what makes me a buzzkill, I know.

Not much of a comedy fan, are you? (i.e., Comedy being “the light treatment of the otherwise base and ugly” ever since the time of the ancient Greeks.)

Every single comment thread on this site is a race to see who will be the first person to take a fictional story -- no matter how absurd, silly, or farcical -- 100% seriously.

EDIT: Bonus points also get awarded to the first person in a thread to act as if readers who like a particular thing in fiction must also support doing it in real life.

last edited at Jul 7, 2020 7:42PM

glad to see the high school girls in her book come to a better end than that poor crocodile

Cheesy and shallow.

Peter Griffin, is that you?

haunting and beautiful

I'm having flashbacks to Ane Log, which isn't a bad thing

The forum never cease to fascinate me. Even the more fluffy or funny manga will have someone still pointing something negative.

I figure it's kids in high school and college who take fiction completely seriously and are always on the lookout for something to be upset by.

Sheesh people really don't like these types of things huh? Lol

It's almost like when you don't tag that a work has rape people who find rape gross will end up reading it and be unhappy about it.

Today I learned I don't find rape gross. Who knew?

more pudding, please ❤

But those fingernails!

I know why I've trimmed mine before. Wink wink, nudge nudge.

I guess that's the conversational equivalent of a double negative - and as easily confusing, it seems.
In that sense, her rebuttal was not nonsensical...

I imagine you're equally baffled when Mick Jagger can’t get no satisfaction.

Sometimes I wonder if the people in the bloody-disgusting.com forums wring their hands in knots discussing the morality in slasher movies or fret about how wrong it is to axe-murder fictional people.

This was just stupid.

Shallow and pedantic.

Asobi Asobase flashbacks:

https://youtu.be/JRiyKRhdhJ4