By the way, androids are still humans. If it thinks like a human, acts like a human, looks like a human and considers itself to be a human, it is one. The only difference is that their ghost is piloting a robot made out of metal while we pilot a robot made out of meat.
That's some pretty bold claims to categorically make about questions heavily dependent on a number of highly complex and entirely unstated premises, not the least the technological assumptions behind the AI.
And how do you define or measure "thinking like a human" in the first place?
It's further compounded by how real-life scientists apparently keep moving the goalposts with every discovery that muddles the boundaries between "human intelligence" and "animal intelligence", precisely because nobody has a damn idea what is it exactly that makes human intelligence special even though the end result (i.e. very complex toolmaking, civilization, etc.) is blatantly obvious.
"Sapience, or human-level intelligence, is very difficult to define, but most people know it when they see it. Why it arose among humans and why it never appeared among any other species is something of a mystery. We naturally see all the advantages to being smart, but evidently it's just one method among many as far as evolution is concerned."
- GURPS Space, Ch. 6: Alien Life And Alien Minds
...and ofc Wittgenstein's chestnut "if the lion could talk we would not understand him" should probably be assumed true until proven otherwise.