This is ridiculous--if those things are irrelevant to the supposed "point of the story," why bring them up at all? If what we care about is the actions of the characters going forward, there's no obvious need for any mystery about their past.
Because we need a strong reason of why Uta was living with Reiichi and Kaoru instead of her parents, despite the fact that she clearly suffers there too?
If the family situation wasn't mentioned at all, someone would very reasonably think it's utterly stupid that Uta lives with them.
If we're supposed to be focused on "these characters slowly growing," why are we not given the background information so we can see what they are growing from and to fully understand how and why they are "growing into" something else?
You don't always need a full background of a character to read about their progression.
Development timing doesn't always start from the very distant past to now.
One thing led to another in Uta's situation. Her broken family led her live with Kaoru and grow her feelings more.
However, we're reading about a story of how she deals with it now.
When Uta first lives with the couple, she is aware of her feelings but she is still.able to manage them. Then her feelings get too much and she finally knows she only has no choice but to leave. All this is a slow process, and you can't have a character quickly go through that. Otherwise it won't be convincing that her feelings were as intense/serious as the author's trying to depict.
Same for Kaoru. Uta had to leave for her development to start. The whole point of her character is that she always avoids uncomfortable situations to the very end. You can't expect to see any drastic change in just two chapters. That would be bad writing.
Also these two characters have an intertwined dynamic. Uta pushes Kaoru to change. I could go on about this specifically, but I've said it in previous posts and I don't want this to be that long.
It's like, you're reading a story about a depressed person. We get hints about their past because it's mandatory, since we know there must be a reason of their depression. But the story focuses on their day to day struggles and how they're trying to deal with it now. How depression affects their lives now and how certain situations are different for them now.
There are different angles a story can focus on, depending on what the author is trying to say. In this example, if the author wanted to show the effects of, for example, an abusive father, they would focus more on the past. If the author wants to focus more on how people are dealing with their depression in daily tasks, they wouldn't add as many background details, but focus on the present more and the background details would be more disperse.
The first narration is about abusive families, the second is about moving forward.
We're not going to get the details about these questions quick. If this bothers you, then yes the story is not for you. No matter how much someone explains why apples are tasty, if you don't like them you don't.
But that's subjective and doesn't mean the story is bad.
last edited at Nov 22, 2019 1:48PM