Well, when I said you don't have to do much analysis...I meant it quite literally. As in you don't have to cut away (ana + lysis) from a story that much to see it's already almost identical to another. Because there is no such thing as original or unique if you take the words by their denotative definition. It's the sort of thinking of "This character is used more than others" that is exactly the trap that we as humans fall in. Because every single character has been used a LOT. And the thing is, that's all we as humans can do is either make stories out of bits and fractions of ideas not our own (or from ideas that were created from ideas that were not our own, etc) or stumble upon something new by accident - which only happens in scientific research if you use the paradigm of 'accident'.
Now don't get me wrong...I am not being pessimistic. I think every story deserves the right to be given its due attention sovereign of how "original" it is. And I do think stories are unique and original, as well as we as human beings...just by the paradigm case of its meaning, not by its literal definition. I love entertainment, and the fact that I've heard a story before does not make me enjoy it any less. It doesn't make any of us enjoy it any less. We just enjoy the story.
There is a such thing as cliché, that's not what I was trying to say either. All I am saying is that cliché carries no weight as an argument.
I think you do understand most of what I am saying though...the idea of liking a genre because you like the clichés is hitting on the broader picture as I was trying to say.
This whole thing is just a giant complicated argument that takes a really close look at way more than just the word 'cliché', it looks at human nature, the scientific composition of us and namely our brain, it observes our behavior...it's really something that's not worth filling this thread about.
I don't even ask that you agree with me, just give these words some thought. You as in anyone reading this, that is.
in a nutshell, saying you don't like something because it's cliche, is just being lazy. why EXACTLY do you not like it? because you've seen that character type a million times before? because you've read the plotline a million times before? but in reality, is that really an excuse to say it's bad? to you personally maybe it is. but to someone else who hasn't seen that character type a million times, or read that plotline a million times, it could be great. considering there is no new ideas anymore, isn't it a bit pretentious to say something is cliche based on your own personal reading history? for something to be a bad story, you need to look into things in much more detail. was the character growth spotty? nonexistant? characters unlikable? the research into topics used in the story done poorly? etc etc. but to do that would require in depth analysis and people just don't want to do that with something they read for entertainment. so, instead, they just slap "cliche" onto it. because honestly, a story can be unique, or original, and still be bad. just because it's cliche does not mean it will be bad, and just because it's original or unique, does not mean it will be good.
last edited at Jan 21, 2015 11:43PM