Bridget being trans caused a big fuss back when it happened, in part due to how poorly managed and executed the retcon was, but even before word of god silenced the transphobes I feel like I saw the majority of the internet enthusiastically embrace the change. I saw a little discussion about the unfortunate choice to take away one of the premier internet femboys, already in short supply, but other nuanced discussion about Bridget's established forcefem backstory/character giving the retcon (at best) kind of questionable optics was very limited and brief.
Admittedly, I'm coming at this from entirely outside the series, but to me trans Bridget seems like an overall weaker, less interesting version of the character. I'm genuinely curious why the broad reception was and is so positive, but I wouldn't have brought it up at all this long after the fact if I hadn't thought of something... We have yet to even learn the name of Bridget's twin. Why didn't they take the opportunity to introduce them and have them be trans instead? It would have avoided retconning a beloved character and, in my opinion, made for a much funnier and less problematic story of both children breaking free of their weird, prejudiced parents.
Edit: I refer to "retcon" specifically based on the aforementioned word of god, not in denial of it. If you'll forgive my paraphrasing, the idea of Bridget being trans was said to be part of the original story planned for them, but the writers felt they couldn't tell the story at the time. Implicitly, that means they had been telling a different story until Strive. Remember that fictional characters do not exist outside of their media, and therefore unlike a real trans person, it is possible for a character to "become" transgender.
last edited at Apr 20, 2026 10:42PM
juanelric
Apr 20, 2026 10:08PM
I find it hard to believe you're asking this in good faith, because femboys are anything but "on short supply".
Hell, femboys are so much more common than trans characters that even when characters are unambiguously introduced as trans or otherwise uncomfortable with their birth gender without "being introduced as guys first" (see Lily from Zombie Land Saga and Mizuki from Project Sekai) people will still deliberately push them onto the femboy label.
Hell, one of the most famous "femboy" characters out there is Shimakaze from Kantai Collection, and she was never anything but a girl in any official media, so I find it hard to believe femboy enjoyers are starving.
last edited at Apr 20, 2026 10:26PM
Galim
Apr 20, 2026 10:33PM
^ You know what, that's fair. I should have been clearer. By "premier internet femboy", I was specifically referring to widely-known characters around which there is no controversy, like Astolfo. Or Bridget, prior to the retcon.
I'm certainly attached to some niche GNC characters for similar reasons, but femboys are not my thing, so I haven't been much exposed to examples outside the zeitgiest. I guess I should also qualify that in my mind, there is intra-fandom discourse and broader discourse. I am specifically coming from the "broader discourse" here, observing that both streams seem to agree on Bridget and not getting it.
Nonna_SoF
Apr 20, 2026 10:38PM
Those are some impressive text walls I'm not reading...
juanelric
Apr 20, 2026 10:41PM
There are still more "unambiguous femboy" characters than intentionally transcoded ones in Japanese media. And a lot of the "unambiguous femboy" character still have the "uncomfortable with their birth gender" trait (like Luka from Steins;Gate).
last edited at Apr 20, 2026 10:50PM
Galim
Apr 20, 2026 10:48PM
^^ I've wanted an insider view on this for a while and I didn't/don't have a lot of places in mind to ask about it. Sue me.
^ Okay. Whether you believe I'm in good faith or not, could I ask you to give your opinion on my idea regarding Bridget's twin? That's the actual reason I made this whole post.
last edited at Apr 20, 2026 10:48PM
juanelric
Apr 20, 2026 10:54PM
I have no opinion on Bridget's twin, personally. I'm more interested as to why you think being forced to present as woman while identifying as a man is less problematic than if you're a trans woman.
last edited at Apr 20, 2026 10:59PM
Galim
Apr 20, 2026 11:02PM
^ It is problematic, that's the core of my point, but the way Bridget chose to act defiantly within those circumstances made for an interesting, compelling GNC character. Post-retcon, while there's not any provable causal relationship (and almost certainly not an intended one) between Bridget being forcefemmed and coming out as trans, it makes for weird optics and ambiguity in a way there was no real need for. Without knowing the writer's thoughts, it seems short-sighted on their part. Hence the hypothetical.
last edited at Apr 20, 2026 11:03PM
juanelric
Apr 20, 2026 11:07PM
?
I don't see how it is only defiance if Bridget still identifies as a man
Galim
Apr 20, 2026 11:19PM
^ If you're only going to look for missing words and use them to conveniently misinterpret what I'm saying, I think we're at an impasse.
juanelric
Apr 20, 2026 11:28PM
^Look, I'm doing my best to interpret what you actually said. It genuinely looks like you think it's less problematic if Bridget is a femboy.
last edited at Apr 20, 2026 11:35PM
Galim
Apr 20, 2026 11:44PM
^ Okay, let me put it this way. To my eyes, pre-retcon Bridget was more positive in being trans-coded than post-retcon being trans. Their parents assigned them a gender for backwards reasons, and rather than let that define them, they chose to loudly declare themselves not the gender they were assigned, without erasing the trauma of their parents treatment (which the nun outfit represents).
Post-retcon, nothing of that is necessarily lost, but there's a lot of room for the aforementioned positive qualities to potentially resonate negatively instead. For example, seeing Bridget circling back around to her assigned gender as a form of regression or arrested development. If anything, what I'm curious about is why no one seems to see them that way.
last edited at Apr 20, 2026 11:47PM
Galim
Apr 20, 2026 11:50PM
For the record, I'm still interested to know if anyone has thoughts on my hypothetical of Bridget's twin.
Zesc
Apr 20, 2026 11:54PM
Prolly getting ninja'd, so:
Look, I'm doing my best to interpret what you actually said. It genuinely looks like you think it's less problematic if Bridget is a femboy.
The point is that up until that event Guilty Gear has been telling the story of a man coming to terms with his non-standard gender expression. Then it pivoted to a woman accepting her transness instead. It's retconning the one development for the sake of the other, to the detriment of both.
At worst, if you're willing to to read too much into a franchise whith prostate exams as finishing moves, it can be seen as reinforcing the "if you're femine, you're a woman, if you're masculine, you're a dude" thinking common even in so-called progressive circles, where any form of gender non-conformance is nigh-pressured into identifying as trans.
As for my personal opinion, it's probably better that ArcSys went with a canonical trans charcter over going with the tropes oh-so-common in japanese media [regarding feminine-presenting males/Otokonoko], but the execution of that decision was clumsy at best. "They're kind of confused, but they got the spirit", and all that.
Mod Edit: Avoid the use of the slur. Enclosing it in quotes does not stop it from being such.
Zesc Edit: Fair, though I edited your edit because I explicitly did not mean transfems but GNC males.
last edited at Apr 22, 2026 8:13AM
Galim
Apr 21, 2026 12:05AM
^ Is it a [problem] if everyone who makes the assumption is loudly refuted? I suppose diegetically it's still a [problem], but not to the viewer, which is sort of subversive.
I feel very strongly connected to a certain subset of GNC female characters, but I am careful to compartmentalize what is explicit, what is implicit with an evidence-based case (headcanon), and what could be implicit but only has vibes (what I call heartcanon). This really limits my options, and I am at peace with that. I know people are starved for trans rep, but watching them latch onto canon and especially headcanon even when the character actually makes for really bad trans rep always confuses me. Bridget's a whole order of magnitude less bad in this regard than Yamato from One Piece, but I thought that fact would allow for more nuance.
Edit: You're probably right that it will be better in the long-term. The character as they now exist will mutate based on the writers of the era and what the fans of the era want, and eventually the origin of the controversy will become irrelevant. Poison is pretty celebrated now, but she was introduced under the premise that punching gang-affiliated trans women would be perfectly acceptable where punching cis women would have raised eyebrows.
Mod Edit: Removed unnecessary usage of a term. If you can avoid it, then don't use it. Putting in it quotes over and over does not diminish the problem.
last edited at Apr 22, 2026 12:38AM by MrEngenious
LilyStorm
Apr 21, 2026 6:55AM
As a transwoman its really nice to see representation in such a large franchise and even moreso when shes also yuri. I think femboys are cool but yeah all that stuff above reads as masking transphobia
Kiana
Apr 21, 2026 9:12AM
One of my favorite polycule ships. Though now Unika may need to be integrated into it. Lot of great Bridget ships, she's practically an admiral.
Galim
Apr 21, 2026 5:05PM
@LilyStorm Philosophical question for you: If your thoughts on something are only as complex as a facial expression, is it really something that matters to you?
Curlysquare
Apr 21, 2026 11:54PM
Galim genuinely what the fuck are you talking about. Why do you argue so passionately about a character you admitted you don't follow the series of. Why do you believe "we wanted to bridget to be transgender earlier but felt we couldn't" to mean "bridget was never meant to be transgender until now". Do you have some sort of condition where seventeen monkeys hit your skull with hammers? Why do you believe a character being [secretly male and then later realizing they're female means they weren't confused before]?
You bring up writers intent and then say "well we'll never know their intent and that's why I'm arguing this" despite famously the creators coming out to clarify their intent.
You're not even a good shit stirrer. You play your hand face up.
Mod Edit: Don't use the slur. Quotes around it doesn't stop it from being one.
last edited at Apr 22, 2026 12:50AM by MrEngenious
MrEngenious
Apr 22, 2026 12:53AM
This is not the best place to discuss in essay-length about how a Japanese fighting game developer over the course of decades and several writers probably sucks ass at writing about gender issues in their arcade mode of their fighting game. This is not their first retcon and also isn't going to be their last.
Galim
Apr 22, 2026 4:18AM
If I may, rather than attempt to continue any specific conversation here, I'd like to point out two things. First, that zero replies were made that addressed the only thing(s) I actually solicited in my orginal comment. Not even in tandem with criticisms or attacks. Do people just not do hypotheticals? Second, if my intent was malicious, I could have commented on any previous Bridget image. My account isn't new.
Lariria
Apr 22, 2026 4:59AM
Ah I see we have a classic case of somebody attempting to mask their transphobia behind shit tons of words because they(I do not know your pronouns, so if this is incorrect, my mistake and I apologize) got real attached to bridget porn prior to her being retconned into being a trans woman.
Get a life lmao
moxmax
Apr 22, 2026 7:28AM
As someone with gender dysphoria, I love you Galim
Bridgette conforming into the gender that was assigned to by their parents is problematic. Not only does this peddle the forced feminization & groomer narrative but Bridgette looking & dressing as a female while being male was also a positive message about freedom to express yourself however you want no matter gender as well as a positive pro-trans message. It's a damn shame people are too afraid to discuss this stuff cuz someone people will assume it's just transphobia, way too many discussions have been shut down that way & shutting down discussions can only do harm. Your idea with the twin was a much better way to include a trans individual if they really wanted to. I'm glad you weren't afraid to have this discussion. I really just made an account just to thank you cuz it's so rare to see someone not be afraid of being called a transphobe.
Zesc
Apr 22, 2026 8:11AM
^ You know your account creation date is visible in the overall image thread? ...At the other hand Galim explicitly pointing out their account age hours beforehand would make you being a sock puppet extra stupid, so in dubio pro reo, I guess?
To reiterate my past preemptive agreement with MrEngenious (whose behest to not continue this any further I am wantonly defying): Guilty Gear is a mess that deals with a plethora of issues as ankle-deep as you'd expect from an arcade fighting game. (Let's see: Aba's abuse is played for laughs, Dizzy's age, the entire Sol/Jack-O situation was icky iirc, and much, much more.)
Just because Bridget could have been handled better does not mean it was made with malicious intent (methinks much to the contrary). It's "bad representation" in quality, not faith.
At the same time the apparent paranoia over transphobia here flabbergasts me when "insistently casting somebody into the wrong gender based on arbitrary superficial factors is messed up" should be something GNC and transgender populations (who aren't disjunct, btw) can agree on. We're in the same goat, and I promise you don't have to search long to find actual transphobia on the net.
Always immediately assuming the worst intentions as I did mere paragraphs ago gets you nowhere except backwards fast as people are afraid to attempt queer representation in the first place, ask genuine questions or bring forth criticism.
moxmax
Apr 22, 2026 8:51AM
^ Yeah I'm sure they didn't mean any harm, in fact I believe they definitely intended to do good with it. But when you really put it into words, it makes it look terrible. The fact not many considered that was definitely cuz of the fear of people calling them all kinds of names when in reality they're both on the same team, like you seem to agree. I don't see how you thought I believed the writers intentions was genuinely to make trans people look bad if that's what you're implying cuz yeah I agree, looking for the worst intentions isn't helpful at all as you admit. I was just pointing out how it may look problematic. Just because transphobia is easy to find, doesn't mean you should assume it on everyone.
Casusby
Apr 22, 2026 10:34AM
There may be a place for this discussion, but it is not in the image comments of an unrelated image. It is not asking you to start such a discussion. Do not use the image comments in this way.
I'm going to be very clear, do not continue. Defying warnings to stop will result in being banned.
Galim Apr 20, 2026 8:48PM
Bridget being trans caused a big fuss back when it happened, in part due to how poorly managed and executed the retcon was, but even before word of god silenced the transphobes I feel like I saw the majority of the internet enthusiastically embrace the change. I saw a little discussion about the unfortunate choice to take away one of the premier internet femboys, already in short supply, but other nuanced discussion about Bridget's established forcefem backstory/character giving the retcon (at best) kind of questionable optics was very limited and brief.
Admittedly, I'm coming at this from entirely outside the series, but to me trans Bridget seems like an overall weaker, less interesting version of the character. I'm genuinely curious why the broad reception was and is so positive, but I wouldn't have brought it up at all this long after the fact if I hadn't thought of something... We have yet to even learn the name of Bridget's twin. Why didn't they take the opportunity to introduce them and have them be trans instead? It would have avoided retconning a beloved character and, in my opinion, made for a much funnier and less problematic story of both children breaking free of their weird, prejudiced parents.
Edit: I refer to "retcon" specifically based on the aforementioned word of god, not in denial of it. If you'll forgive my paraphrasing, the idea of Bridget being trans was said to be part of the original story planned for them, but the writers felt they couldn't tell the story at the time. Implicitly, that means they had been telling a different story until Strive. Remember that fictional characters do not exist outside of their media, and therefore unlike a real trans person, it is possible for a character to "become" transgender.
last edited at Apr 20, 2026 10:42PM
juanelric Apr 20, 2026 10:08PM
I find it hard to believe you're asking this in good faith, because femboys are anything but "on short supply".
Hell, femboys are so much more common than trans characters that even when characters are unambiguously introduced as trans or otherwise uncomfortable with their birth gender without "being introduced as guys first" (see Lily from Zombie Land Saga and Mizuki from Project Sekai) people will still deliberately push them onto the femboy label.
Hell, one of the most famous "femboy" characters out there is Shimakaze from Kantai Collection, and she was never anything but a girl in any official media, so I find it hard to believe femboy enjoyers are starving.
last edited at Apr 20, 2026 10:26PM
Galim Apr 20, 2026 10:33PM
^ You know what, that's fair. I should have been clearer. By "premier internet femboy", I was specifically referring to widely-known characters around which there is no controversy, like Astolfo. Or Bridget, prior to the retcon.
I'm certainly attached to some niche GNC characters for similar reasons, but femboys are not my thing, so I haven't been much exposed to examples outside the zeitgiest. I guess I should also qualify that in my mind, there is intra-fandom discourse and broader discourse. I am specifically coming from the "broader discourse" here, observing that both streams seem to agree on Bridget and not getting it.
Nonna_SoF Apr 20, 2026 10:38PM
Those are some impressive text walls I'm not reading...
juanelric Apr 20, 2026 10:41PM
There are still more "unambiguous femboy" characters than intentionally transcoded ones in Japanese media. And a lot of the "unambiguous femboy" character still have the "uncomfortable with their birth gender" trait (like Luka from Steins;Gate).
last edited at Apr 20, 2026 10:50PM
Galim Apr 20, 2026 10:48PM
^^ I've wanted an insider view on this for a while and I didn't/don't have a lot of places in mind to ask about it. Sue me.
^ Okay. Whether you believe I'm in good faith or not, could I ask you to give your opinion on my idea regarding Bridget's twin? That's the actual reason I made this whole post.
last edited at Apr 20, 2026 10:48PM
juanelric Apr 20, 2026 10:54PM
I have no opinion on Bridget's twin, personally. I'm more interested as to why you think being forced to present as woman while identifying as a man is less problematic than if you're a trans woman.
last edited at Apr 20, 2026 10:59PM
Galim Apr 20, 2026 11:02PM
^ It is problematic, that's the core of my point, but the way Bridget chose to act defiantly within those circumstances made for an interesting, compelling GNC character. Post-retcon, while there's not any provable causal relationship (and almost certainly not an intended one) between Bridget being forcefemmed and coming out as trans, it makes for weird optics and ambiguity in a way there was no real need for. Without knowing the writer's thoughts, it seems short-sighted on their part. Hence the hypothetical.
last edited at Apr 20, 2026 11:03PM
juanelric Apr 20, 2026 11:07PM
?
I don't see how it is only defiance if Bridget still identifies as a man
Galim Apr 20, 2026 11:19PM
^ If you're only going to look for missing words and use them to conveniently misinterpret what I'm saying, I think we're at an impasse.
juanelric Apr 20, 2026 11:28PM
^Look, I'm doing my best to interpret what you actually said. It genuinely looks like you think it's less problematic if Bridget is a femboy.
last edited at Apr 20, 2026 11:35PM
Galim Apr 20, 2026 11:44PM
^ Okay, let me put it this way. To my eyes, pre-retcon Bridget was more positive in being trans-coded than post-retcon being trans. Their parents assigned them a gender for backwards reasons, and rather than let that define them, they chose to loudly declare themselves not the gender they were assigned, without erasing the trauma of their parents treatment (which the nun outfit represents).
Post-retcon, nothing of that is necessarily lost, but there's a lot of room for the aforementioned positive qualities to potentially resonate negatively instead. For example, seeing Bridget circling back around to her assigned gender as a form of regression or arrested development. If anything, what I'm curious about is why no one seems to see them that way.
last edited at Apr 20, 2026 11:47PM
Galim Apr 20, 2026 11:50PM
For the record, I'm still interested to know if anyone has thoughts on my hypothetical of Bridget's twin.
Zesc Apr 20, 2026 11:54PM
Prolly getting ninja'd, so:
The point is that up until that event Guilty Gear has been telling the story of a man coming to terms with his non-standard gender expression. Then it pivoted to a woman accepting her transness instead. It's retconning the one development for the sake of the other, to the detriment of both.
At worst, if you're willing to to read too much into a franchise whith prostate exams as finishing moves, it can be seen as reinforcing the "if you're femine, you're a woman, if you're masculine, you're a dude" thinking common even in so-called progressive circles, where any form of gender non-conformance is nigh-pressured into identifying as trans.
As for my personal opinion, it's probably better that ArcSys went with a canonical trans charcter over going with the tropes oh-so-common in japanese media [regarding feminine-presenting males/Otokonoko], but the execution of that decision was clumsy at best. "They're kind of confused, but they got the spirit", and all that.
Mod Edit: Avoid the use of the slur. Enclosing it in quotes does not stop it from being such.
Zesc Edit: Fair, though I edited your edit because I explicitly did not mean transfems but GNC males.
last edited at Apr 22, 2026 8:13AM
Galim Apr 21, 2026 12:05AM
^ Is it a [problem] if everyone who makes the assumption is loudly refuted? I suppose diegetically it's still a [problem], but not to the viewer, which is sort of subversive.
I feel very strongly connected to a certain subset of GNC female characters, but I am careful to compartmentalize what is explicit, what is implicit with an evidence-based case (headcanon), and what could be implicit but only has vibes (what I call heartcanon). This really limits my options, and I am at peace with that. I know people are starved for trans rep, but watching them latch onto canon and especially headcanon even when the character actually makes for really bad trans rep always confuses me. Bridget's a whole order of magnitude less bad in this regard than Yamato from One Piece, but I thought that fact would allow for more nuance.
Edit: You're probably right that it will be better in the long-term. The character as they now exist will mutate based on the writers of the era and what the fans of the era want, and eventually the origin of the controversy will become irrelevant. Poison is pretty celebrated now, but she was introduced under the premise that punching gang-affiliated trans women would be perfectly acceptable where punching cis women would have raised eyebrows.
Mod Edit: Removed unnecessary usage of a term. If you can avoid it, then don't use it. Putting in it quotes over and over does not diminish the problem.
last edited at Apr 22, 2026 12:38AM by MrEngenious
LilyStorm Apr 21, 2026 6:55AM
As a transwoman its really nice to see representation in such a large franchise and even moreso when shes also yuri. I think femboys are cool but yeah all that stuff above reads as masking transphobia
Kiana Apr 21, 2026 9:12AM
One of my favorite polycule ships. Though now Unika may need to be integrated into it. Lot of great Bridget ships, she's practically an admiral.
Galim Apr 21, 2026 5:05PM
@LilyStorm Philosophical question for you: If your thoughts on something are only as complex as a facial expression, is it really something that matters to you?
Curlysquare Apr 21, 2026 11:54PM
Galim genuinely what the fuck are you talking about. Why do you argue so passionately about a character you admitted you don't follow the series of. Why do you believe "we wanted to bridget to be transgender earlier but felt we couldn't" to mean "bridget was never meant to be transgender until now". Do you have some sort of condition where seventeen monkeys hit your skull with hammers? Why do you believe a character being [secretly male and then later realizing they're female means they weren't confused before]?
You bring up writers intent and then say "well we'll never know their intent and that's why I'm arguing this" despite famously the creators coming out to clarify their intent.
You're not even a good shit stirrer. You play your hand face up.
Mod Edit: Don't use the slur. Quotes around it doesn't stop it from being one.
last edited at Apr 22, 2026 12:50AM by MrEngenious
MrEngenious Apr 22, 2026 12:53AM
This is not the best place to discuss in essay-length about how a Japanese fighting game developer over the course of decades and several writers probably sucks ass at writing about gender issues in their arcade mode of their fighting game. This is not their first retcon and also isn't going to be their last.
Galim Apr 22, 2026 4:18AM
If I may, rather than attempt to continue any specific conversation here, I'd like to point out two things. First, that zero replies were made that addressed the only thing(s) I actually solicited in my orginal comment. Not even in tandem with criticisms or attacks. Do people just not do hypotheticals? Second, if my intent was malicious, I could have commented on any previous Bridget image. My account isn't new.
Lariria Apr 22, 2026 4:59AM
Ah I see we have a classic case of somebody attempting to mask their transphobia behind shit tons of words because they(I do not know your pronouns, so if this is incorrect, my mistake and I apologize) got real attached to bridget porn prior to her being retconned into being a trans woman.
Get a life lmao
moxmax Apr 22, 2026 7:28AM
As someone with gender dysphoria, I love you Galim
Bridgette conforming into the gender that was assigned to by their parents is problematic. Not only does this peddle the forced feminization & groomer narrative but Bridgette looking & dressing as a female while being male was also a positive message about freedom to express yourself however you want no matter gender as well as a positive pro-trans message. It's a damn shame people are too afraid to discuss this stuff cuz someone people will assume it's just transphobia, way too many discussions have been shut down that way & shutting down discussions can only do harm. Your idea with the twin was a much better way to include a trans individual if they really wanted to. I'm glad you weren't afraid to have this discussion. I really just made an account just to thank you cuz it's so rare to see someone not be afraid of being called a transphobe.
Zesc Apr 22, 2026 8:11AM
^ You know your account creation date is visible in the overall image thread? ...At the other hand Galim explicitly pointing out their account age hours beforehand would make you being a sock puppet extra stupid, so in dubio pro reo, I guess?
To reiterate my past preemptive agreement with MrEngenious (whose behest to not continue this any further I am wantonly defying): Guilty Gear is a mess that deals with a plethora of issues as ankle-deep as you'd expect from an arcade fighting game. (Let's see: Aba's abuse is played for laughs, Dizzy's age, the entire Sol/Jack-O situation was icky iirc, and much, much more.)
Just because Bridget could have been handled better does not mean it was made with malicious intent (methinks much to the contrary). It's "bad representation" in quality, not faith.
At the same time the apparent paranoia over transphobia here flabbergasts me when "insistently casting somebody into the wrong gender based on arbitrary superficial factors is messed up" should be something GNC and transgender populations (who aren't disjunct, btw) can agree on. We're in the same goat, and I promise you don't have to search long to find actual transphobia on the net.
Always immediately assuming the worst intentions as I did mere paragraphs ago gets you nowhere except backwards fast as people are afraid to attempt queer representation in the first place, ask genuine questions or bring forth criticism.
moxmax Apr 22, 2026 8:51AM
^ Yeah I'm sure they didn't mean any harm, in fact I believe they definitely intended to do good with it. But when you really put it into words, it makes it look terrible. The fact not many considered that was definitely cuz of the fear of people calling them all kinds of names when in reality they're both on the same team, like you seem to agree. I don't see how you thought I believed the writers intentions was genuinely to make trans people look bad if that's what you're implying cuz yeah I agree, looking for the worst intentions isn't helpful at all as you admit. I was just pointing out how it may look problematic. Just because transphobia is easy to find, doesn't mean you should assume it on everyone.
Casusby Apr 22, 2026 10:34AM
There may be a place for this discussion, but it is not in the image comments of an unrelated image. It is not asking you to start such a discussion. Do not use the image comments in this way.
I'm going to be very clear, do not continue. Defying warnings to stop will result in being banned.
Narrow Escape Apr 23, 2026 12:19PM
Thought this one looked familiar. Finished version of https://dynasty-scans.com/images/29634?tag_id=27714 .